.
-Shaleen
- Original Message -
From:
Jamadagni, Rajendra
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 8:49
AM
Subject: RE: Experiences with Automatic
Undo Management
Dan,
We are using AUM on ALL our PROD/DEVL/TEST environments
list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Shaleen
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San
Title: NVL and index usage
In a quick test on 9013 it changed the index which
it was using and went from Range scan to fast full scan.
- Original Message -
From:
Jamadagni, Rajendra
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 9:48
AM
Title: Extremely Slow Query
Doesnt seem to be a problem in my 9013 instance.
returned 240 rows in 1.26 elapsed seconds
- Original Message -
From:
Jamadagni, Rajendra
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:51
PM
Subject:
. Reducing
db_files to 400 did not give this message. Interesting thing is that we
increased file descriptors very recently from 64 to 1024. Does anyone have more
information on this?
Thanks
Shaleen
the message is shown. Try a
value for db_files, which is little below than ½ the OS limit . Thank you
Giridhar
- Original Message -
From:
Shaleen
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 11:40
AM
Subject: db_files and file
#
and col.obj# = ac.obj#(+)
and col.intcol# = ac.intcol#(+)
-Shaleen
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 12:23 PM
As part of the process of making sure that null/not null constraints
are consistent across
#(+)
-Shaleen
- Original Message -
From: Rachel Carmichael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 12:23 PM
Subject: this doesn't look right
As part of the process of making sure that null/not null constraints
here.
Thanks
Shaleen
- Original Message -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Shaleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 11:09 PM
procedure --Resolved
Shaleen,
This is done to preserve security.
User A owns a table MY_TABLE.
Role A_STUFF allows insert, select, update, delete
list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Shaleen
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San
Shaleen
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 12:39 PM
This may be more convincing:
http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_datab
ase_id=NOTp_id=1031418.6
regards,
Waleed
the procedure. This
administration
raises the complexity of this process to the nth degree and as such the
decision was made to ignore roles.
Thanks
Shaleen
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 12:39 PM
except one which corresponds to a
static master table containing PO TYPES. That table is not being updated.
How can I dig deeper into this issue.
Thanks
Shaleen
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 1:58 AM
this limitation beats me!!
Thanks for help Jared Raj.
Shaleen
. I am unable
to understand why the update statements are requesting SSX lock on the
table. This is not a case of primary/forign key issue with a missing index
in child table where primary key is change in master table because master
table is not being updated.
Thanks
Shaleen
Deadlock graph
my unix sysadmin was kind enough to give me following few monts ago. Works
great and can be used for creating any date in dd-mon-yy format
DAY=`perl -e 'use POSIX qw(strftime); print strftime(%d-%b-%y,
localtime(time() - 86400)) . \n ;'`
HTH
Shaleen
- Original Message -
To: Multiple
accessFri Dec 20 12:57:11 2002Error 604 happened during
db open, shutting down databaseUSER: terminating instance due to error
604Instance terminated by USER, pid = 17612ORA-1092 signalled during:
alter database open read only...
Thanks
Shaleen
Title: RE: ora_sql_txt system defined event attribute
couldn't find anything abt ora_sql_text on
metalink. What is this? How do you capture ddl from ksdwrt?
Thanks
Shaleen
- Original Message -
From:
Jamadagni, Rajendra
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent
procedure
HTH
Shaleen
- Original Message -
From:
Yechiel
Adar
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 12:38
AM
Subject: Re: Purging Managed Standby
Database Archive Logs
Hello Steve
If you
this by deleting the statistics for that particular table and I am never
going to analyze that table again.
Thanks
Shaleen
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:14 PM
John,
Shaleen mentioned to me, in a direct e-mail
This error happens when 8i jdbc driver is used to connect to 9i database. we
reolved this by using 9i jdbc classes file. This error prevents the client
from opening connection to database.
-Shaleen
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
John,
Thanks for the input. As far as I can see that sql's are exactly same in my
example. Morover none of the initialization parameters have been changed.
Need input from all Gurus
Thanks
Shaleen
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
22 matches
Mail list logo