RE: how do I interpret this in bstat/estat

2004-01-21 Thread nelson . petersen
Gene, I strongly recommend implementing Statspack. It is very straight-forward. Just do it when you have exclusive use of the database, or comment out the following two lines in ora_rdbms_admin:SPCUSR.SQL if you have these packages already installed. (We're running 8.1.7 on

RE: All packages under sys is invalid

2004-01-21 Thread nelson . petersen
Is sombebody playing with Statspack (spcreate.sql)? One piece of the install runs dbmspool.sql Nelson -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 3:59 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L So what's the recommendation, how can I recompile all the SYS packages?

RE: table reorganizations - simple/complex

2004-01-08 Thread nelson . petersen
use Method-R. I'm not sure how a badly fragmented table would show up in a 10046 trace file. If a table reorganization is really required, I think a trace would show excess physical io. Nelson Petersen -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: INET: [EMAIL

RE: Little competition

2003-12-11 Thread nelson . petersen
What's wrong with the analysis? Wrong syntax in the 'CREATE TABLE' PCTFREE and PCTUSEDare not part of the storage clause. SQL create table t1 (c1 number) tablespace lmt1 pctfree 20 pctused 30; Table created. Lot's of potential to go down the wrong path on this one. Assumptions!

RE: Windows clustering???

2003-12-10 Thread nelson . petersen
Now you've got me going, Rich. After 15 years of VMS we're being forced to use UNIX (HP-UX 11i) just because the application we want to use doesn't run on VMS. (Developers needed to re-write the app for VMS. Marketing needed so the developers will be paid and the company will be profitable.)

RE: Analytic bug in 9.2.0.4

2003-12-05 Thread nelson . petersen
The same thing occurs on OpenVMS on version 9.2.0.4 of Oracle. Nelson -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:29 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Analytic bug in 9.2.0.4While playing around

RE: decrease initial extent

2003-12-03 Thread nelson . petersen
Title: RE: decrease initial extent Since I agreed with Mladen that it wouldn't work, I just had to test this. On 8.1.7.3 on OpenVMS the "deallocate unused keep #" shrinks the initial extent. It shrank a test table from 1m to 8k. I'm not sure why it chose 8k. (db_block_size=4k,default