RE: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2
I've no experience with Peoplesoft and Oracle 9, but .. Try setting the following parameters optimizer_features_enable = 8.1.6 As I recall this prevented Oracle from incorrectly tossing out some subselects. I'm not sure if it is even valid in 9iR2 _ignore_desc_in_index = TRUE Not setting this can result in horrendous performance problems. Ian MacGregor -Original Message- Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:19 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Can you please list select emplid, empl_rcd, effdt, effseq, empl_status from ps_job where emplid = '3442' At 03:34 PM 8/6/2003 -0800, you wrote: While I am waiting for oracle support to respond to my tar update (2nd callback) I am just wondering if anybody has found this problem. We have the following select query (from a peoplesoft implementation) SELECT a.emplid, a.effdt FROM PS_JOB A WHERE A.EFFDT = (SELECT MAX(A1.EFFDT) FROM PS_JOB A1 WHERE A.EMPLID = A1.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A1.EMPL_RCD AND A1.EFFDT = SYSDATE) AND A.EFFSEQ = (SELECT MAX(A2.EFFSEQ) FROM PS_JOB A2 WHERE A.EMPLID = A2.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A2.EMPL_RCD AND A.EFFDT = A2.EFFDT) AND A.EMPL_STATUS = 'A' and a.emplid='3442' when we run the query we get one row back, but when we replace the field names with count(*), the resulting answer back is 2. We have tested it in 8.0.5.1.1 and we get the correct results, 1 row, and a count of 1. Darren --- - -- Darren Browett P.EngThis message was transmitted Data Administrator using 100% recycled electrons Information and Communication Technology City of Coquitlam P:(604)927 - 3614 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Browett, Darren INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Wolfgang Breitling Centrex Consulting Corporation http://www.centrexcc.com -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Wolfgang Breitling INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: MacGregor, Ian A. INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
RE: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2
Title: RE: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2 You it is a bug alter session|system set _unnest_subquery=false / Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art ! -Original Message- From: Browett, Darren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:34 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2 While I am waiting for oracle support to respond to my tar update (2nd callback) I am just wondering if anybody has found this problem. We have the following select query (from a peoplesoft implementation) SELECT a.emplid, a.effdt FROM PS_JOB A WHERE A.EFFDT = (SELECT MAX(A1.EFFDT) FROM PS_JOB A1 WHERE A.EMPLID = A1.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A1.EMPL_RCD AND A1.EFFDT = SYSDATE) AND A.EFFSEQ = (SELECT MAX(A2.EFFSEQ) FROM PS_JOB A2 WHERE A.EMPLID = A2.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A2.EMPL_RCD AND A.EFFDT = A2.EFFDT) AND A.EMPL_STATUS = 'A' and a.emplid='3442' when we run the query we get one row back, but when we replace the field names with count(*), the resulting answer back is 2. We have tested it in 8.0.5.1.1 and we get the correct results, 1 row, and a count of 1. Darren -- Darren Browett P.Eng This message was transmitted Data Administrator using 100% recycled electrons Information and Communication Technology City of Coquitlam P:(604)927 - 3614 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Browett, Darren INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank you.*2
RE: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2
Title: Message That fixed it, thank you. I still haven't heard from oracle support yet. -Original Message-From: Jamadagni, Rajendra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:44 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2 You it is a bug alter session|system set "_unnest_subquery"=false / Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art ! -Original Message- From: Browett, Darren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:34 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2 While I am waiting for oracle support to respond to my tar update (2nd callback) I am just wondering if anybody has found this problem. We have the following select query (from a peoplesoft implementation) SELECT a.emplid, a.effdt FROM PS_JOB A WHERE A.EFFDT = (SELECT MAX(A1.EFFDT) FROM PS_JOB A1 WHERE A.EMPLID = A1.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A1.EMPL_RCD AND A1.EFFDT = SYSDATE) AND A.EFFSEQ = (SELECT MAX(A2.EFFSEQ) FROM PS_JOB A2 WHERE A.EMPLID = A2.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A2.EMPL_RCD AND A.EFFDT = A2.EFFDT) AND A.EMPL_STATUS = 'A' and a.emplid='3442' when we run the query we get one row back, but when we replace the field names with count(*), the resulting answer back is "2". We have tested it in 8.0.5.1.1 and we get the correct results, 1 row, and a count of 1. Darren -- Darren Browett P.Eng This message was transmitted Data Administrator using 100% recycled electrons Information and Communication Technology City of Coquitlam P:(604)927 - 3614 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Browett, Darren INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
RE: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2
Did you open an iTar with Oracle? If so, what severity was it logged at? How you answer certain questions on the iTAR form will impact the severity of the tar, and as a result the time for responses from Oracle. RF -Original Message- To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Sent: 8/7/2003 1:49 PM That fixed it, thank you. I still haven't heard from oracle support yet. -Original Message- Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:44 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L You it is a bug alter session|system set _unnest_subquery=false / Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art ! -Original Message- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:34 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L While I am waiting for oracle support to respond to my tar update (2nd callback) I am just wondering if anybody has found this problem. We have the following select query (from a peoplesoft implementation) SELECT a.emplid, a.effdt FROM PS_JOB A WHERE A.EFFDT = (SELECT MAX(A1.EFFDT) FROM PS_JOB A1 WHERE A.EMPLID = A1.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A1.EMPL_RCD AND A1.EFFDT = SYSDATE) AND A.EFFSEQ = (SELECT MAX(A2.EFFSEQ) FROM PS_JOB A2 WHERE A.EMPLID = A2.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A2.EMPL_RCD AND A.EFFDT = A2.EFFDT) AND A.EMPL_STATUS = 'A' and a.emplid='3442' when we run the query we get one row back, but when we replace the field names with count(*), the resulting answer back is 2. We have tested it in 8.0.5.1.1 and we get the correct results, 1 row, and a count of 1. Darren -- Darren Browett P.EngThis message was transmitted Data Administrator using 100% recycled electrons Information and Communication Technology City of Coquitlam P:(604)927 - 3614 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Browett, Darren INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Freeman Robert - IL INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Re: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2
Can you please list select emplid, empl_rcd, effdt, effseq, empl_status from ps_job where emplid = '3442' At 03:34 PM 8/6/2003 -0800, you wrote: While I am waiting for oracle support to respond to my tar update (2nd callback) I am just wondering if anybody has found this problem. We have the following select query (from a peoplesoft implementation) SELECT a.emplid, a.effdt FROM PS_JOB A WHERE A.EFFDT = (SELECT MAX(A1.EFFDT) FROM PS_JOB A1 WHERE A.EMPLID = A1.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A1.EMPL_RCD AND A1.EFFDT = SYSDATE) AND A.EFFSEQ = (SELECT MAX(A2.EFFSEQ) FROM PS_JOB A2 WHERE A.EMPLID = A2.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A2.EMPL_RCD AND A.EFFDT = A2.EFFDT) AND A.EMPL_STATUS = 'A' and a.emplid='3442' when we run the query we get one row back, but when we replace the field names with count(*), the resulting answer back is 2. We have tested it in 8.0.5.1.1 and we get the correct results, 1 row, and a count of 1. Darren -- Darren Browett P.EngThis message was transmitted Data Administrator using 100% recycled electrons Information and Communication Technology City of Coquitlam P:(604)927 - 3614 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Browett, Darren INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Wolfgang Breitling Centrex Consulting Corporation http://www.centrexcc.com -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Wolfgang Breitling INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
RE: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2
Title: Message I already have :) -Original Message-From: Jamadagni, Rajendra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 12:04 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2 Tell them ... Raj Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art ! -Original Message-From: Browett, Darren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:49 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2 That fixed it, thank you. I still haven't heard from oracle support yet. -Original Message-From: Jamadagni, Rajendra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:44 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2 You it is a bug alter session|system set "_unnest_subquery"=false / Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art ! -Original Message- From: Browett, Darren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:34 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2 While I am waiting for oracle support to respond to my tar update (2nd callback) I am just wondering if anybody has found this problem. We have the following select query (from a peoplesoft implementation) SELECT a.emplid, a.effdt FROM PS_JOB A WHERE A.EFFDT = (SELECT MAX(A1.EFFDT) FROM PS_JOB A1 WHERE A.EMPLID = A1.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A1.EMPL_RCD AND A1.EFFDT = SYSDATE) AND A.EFFSEQ = (SELECT MAX(A2.EFFSEQ) FROM PS_JOB A2 WHERE A.EMPLID = A2.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A2.EMPL_RCD AND A.EFFDT = A2.EFFDT) AND A.EMPL_STATUS = 'A' and a.emplid='3442' when we run the query we get one row back, but when we replace the field names with count(*), the resulting answer back is "2". We have tested it in 8.0.5.1.1 and we get the correct results, 1 row, and a count of 1. Darren -- Darren Browett P.Eng This message was transmitted Data Administrator using 100% recycled electrons Information and Communication Technology City of Coquitlam P:(604)927 - 3614 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Browett, Darren INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
RE: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2
Title: Message Tell them ... Raj Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art ! -Original Message-From: Browett, Darren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:49 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2 That fixed it, thank you. I still haven't heard from oracle support yet. -Original Message-From: Jamadagni, Rajendra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:44 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2 You it is a bug alter session|system set "_unnest_subquery"=false / Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art ! -Original Message- From: Browett, Darren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:34 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: possible Bug in Oracle 9.2.0.2 While I am waiting for oracle support to respond to my tar update (2nd callback) I am just wondering if anybody has found this problem. We have the following select query (from a peoplesoft implementation) SELECT a.emplid, a.effdt FROM PS_JOB A WHERE A.EFFDT = (SELECT MAX(A1.EFFDT) FROM PS_JOB A1 WHERE A.EMPLID = A1.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A1.EMPL_RCD AND A1.EFFDT = SYSDATE) AND A.EFFSEQ = (SELECT MAX(A2.EFFSEQ) FROM PS_JOB A2 WHERE A.EMPLID = A2.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A2.EMPL_RCD AND A.EFFDT = A2.EFFDT) AND A.EMPL_STATUS = 'A' and a.emplid='3442' when we run the query we get one row back, but when we replace the field names with count(*), the resulting answer back is "2". We have tested it in 8.0.5.1.1 and we get the correct results, 1 row, and a count of 1. Darren -- Darren Browett P.Eng This message was transmitted Data Administrator using 100% recycled electrons Information and Communication Technology City of Coquitlam P:(604)927 - 3614 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Browett, Darren INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank you.*2
