of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:49 PM
Subject: Difference on ArchiveLog (I'm rewriting the question)
Hello Everybody
Im rewriting the question,
Some days ago the database I work on had 3 logfiles that sized 100M and the database was generating 4G of archive daily.
I changed
:
Mauricio Vélez
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:04
PM
Subject: Re: Re: Difference on ArchiveLog
(I'm rewriting the question)
Hello everybody thank for your answers,
the size I'm talking about is summing up real sizes of archivelogs
Mauricio,
Variances of 1G of redo generation (i.e. 4G one day, 2G
another day, 3G another day) are not indicative of anything
unusual. I've seen systems that generate 4T of redo one
day, 6T of redo another day, and then only 0.5T of redo the
following day. All without changing the size of the
Hello Everybody
Im rewriting the question,
Some days ago the database I work on had 3 logfiles that sized 100M and the database was generating 4G of archive daily.
I changed the size to 20M and the database began to generate 2G of archive daily, then I changed to 50M and It began to generate
-
From:
Mauricio Vélez
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:49
PM
Subject: Difference on ArchiveLog (I'm
rewriting the question)
Hello Everybody
Im
rewriting the question,
Some days ago the database I work
on ArchiveLog (I'm rewriting the question)
Hello Everybody
I'm rewriting the question,
Some days ago the database I work on had 3 logfiles that sized 100M and the
database was generating 4G of archive daily.
I changed the size to 20M and the database began
