Re: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to start a

2004-01-30 Thread Thomas Day
: @softhome.net Subject: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to start a dedicated Sent by: ml-errors

RE: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to start a

2004-01-30 Thread Dharminder Softhome
Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to start a dedicated Sent by: ml-errors 01/29/2004 06:14 PM Please respond to ORACLE-L Hey all

RE: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to star

2004-01-30 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F
Subject: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to start a dedicated Sent by: ml-errors 01/29/2004 06:14 PM Please respond

RE: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to star

2004-01-30 Thread Jared . Still
To:Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to star Dharminder, Changes the service to AutoStart when the machine reboots. As Thomas said, the NT service has to be running for you

Re: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to start a dedicated ....

2004-01-30 Thread Vélez
There is not enough memory to start a dedicated connection. sochange the server mode from dedicated to shared, (you can do it change some parameters in init_sid.ora file see oracle documentation). If you are going to change the server mode to shared and you have two databaseon the same machine,

RE: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to start a dedicated ....

2004-01-30 Thread Dharminder Softhome
, 2004 12:39 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to start a dedicated There is not enough memory to start a dedicated connection. sochange the server mode from dedicated to shared, (you can do it change some

RE: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to star

2004-01-30 Thread Dharminder Softhome
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] dharminder cc: @softhome.net Subject: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to start a dedicated Sent

RE: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to star

2004-01-30 Thread Thomas Day
Subject: RE: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to star Sent by: ml-errors

RE: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to star

2004-01-30 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] dharminder cc: @softhome.net Subject: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to start a dedicated Sent

RE: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to star

2004-01-30 Thread Igor Neyman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dharminder cc: @softhome.net Subject: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to start a dedicated Sent by: ml-errors

RE: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to star

2004-01-30 Thread Jacques Kilchoer
-Original Message- Igor Neyman OracleServiceSID starts the database automatically, because by default the registry key ORA_SID_AUTOSTART IN HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ORACLE\HOME0 is set to TRUE. If you don't want your OracleServiceSID to start the database automatically, change

RE: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to star

2004-01-30 Thread Dharminder Softhome
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] dharminder cc: @softhome.net Subject: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to start a dedicated Sent

RE: Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to star

2004-01-30 Thread Igor Neyman
Yes, I'm sure. If in the services control panel you change OracleServiceSID starup properties, it does not affect ORA_SID_AUTOSTART key in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ORACLE\HOME0 (and does not change the way the database is started when the service is started). What it does, it changes the

ORA-01722 invalid number

2004-01-30 Thread Teresita Castro
. The POVAGRMTLN.VEN_AGRMT_REF field is char(30). ORA-01722 invalid number Cause: The attempted conversion of a character string to a number failed because the character string was not a valid numeric literal. Only numeric fields or character fields containing numeric data may be used in arithmetic functions

Re: ORA-01722 invalid number

2004-01-30 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
. The POVAGRMTLN.VEN_AGRMT_REF field is char(30). ORA-01722 invalid number Cause: The attempted conversion of a character string to a number failed because the character string was not a valid numeric literal. Only numeric fields or character fields containing numeric data may be used in arithmetic functions

Re: ORA-01722 invalid number

2004-01-30 Thread Joe Testa
have | any clue why this happen, I read about this error but the help | don't seem to fit on this case. | The POVAGRMTLN.VEN_AGRMT_REF field is char(30). | | ORA-01722 invalid number | | Cause: The attempted conversion of a character string to a number | failed because the character string

Starting Database from OEM 9.2 gives ORA-12500 Failed to start a dedicated ....

2004-01-29 Thread Dharminder Softhome
and then try to start the other database, but it does not start the DB, instead I get ORA-12500 Failed to start a dedicated OEM doc says that with OEM, you can start/shutdown the database using OEM. Can someone point to me what I am doing wrong. I am using sys username/password for the startup

pl/sql tables in pga and ora-4030 was pga_aggregate_target and a

2004-01-23 Thread Jeroen van Sluisdam
more then 30 minutes finally it crashes agaIN VU_2exec testarray( 1 ); begin testarray( 1 ); end; * ERROR at line 1: ORA-06500: PL/SQL: storage error ORA-06512: at VRIJ_UIT.TESTARRAY, line 14 ORA-06512: at line 1 U_2select pool, sum(bytes) from v$sgastat group by pool; POOL SUM(BYTES

RE: ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-21 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
When required I did it through a logon trigger ... wait I still do it. Raj Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having

ORA-28575: RPC connection with external procedure cannot opened

2004-01-21 Thread Luc . Demanche
at line 1: ORA-28575: unable to open RPC connection to external procedure agent ... So the problem could be the listener ... But if a try TNSPING extproc_connection_data, I got OK Here is the copy of my listener file SID_LIST_EXTPROCLISTENER = (SID_LIST = (SID_DESC = (SID_NAME

ORA-12540: TNS: internal limit restriction exceeded

2004-01-21 Thread Murali_Pavuloori/Claritas
/ as sysdba) and ran into ORA-12540: TNS: internal limit restriction exceeded. Where is this limit set? Is it possible to change the setting? Here is some additional information The application that connects to this db is java based...In the past when we were seeing lot of 4030 errors in the alert log

Re: ORA-12540: TNS: internal limit restriction exceeded

2004-01-21 Thread Faan DeSwardt
Murali, Have you checked the OS event logs like the system log? Sounds like you have hit an OS limit. Please post the rest of the error stack that followed the ORA-12450 as this gives more information on what is the root cause of this failure? You can find this in the listener.log at the time

Re: ORA-12540: TNS: internal limit restriction exceeded

2004-01-21 Thread Murali_Pavuloori/Claritas
: | | Subject: Re: ORA-12540: TNS: internal limit restriction exceeded

Re: ORA-12540: TNS: internal limit restriction exceeded

2004-01-21 Thread Faan DeSwardt
| | || |-+ --- ---| | | | To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: ORA-12540: TNS: internal limit restriction exceeded

Re: ORA-12540: TNS: internal limit restriction exceeded

2004-01-21 Thread Paul Drake
| | || |-+ --- ---| | | | To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: ORA-12540: TNS: internal limit restriction exceeded

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-20 Thread Jonathan Lewis
so that's clear now. What still bothers me is that my original program works fine with pga_target = 0 and wa-size-policy=manual When I try this with this test-program it fails (see below) VU_2exec testarray(1); begin testarray(1); end; * ERROR at line 1: ORA-00604: error

Re: ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-20 Thread Mladen Gogala
name. No problem... or so I thought. :( All seems well under OEM and SQL+, but I have a developer who consistently gets an ORA-904 error (invalid column name) when trying to access the new table under TOAD. I can't think of anything weird about this table, except that the original has some

Re: ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-20 Thread Tanel Poder
name. No problem... or so I thought. :( All seems well under OEM and SQL+, but I have a developer who consistently gets an ORA-904 error (invalid column name) when trying to access the new table under TOAD. I can't think of anything weird about this table, except that the original

Re: ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-20 Thread Mladen Gogala
On 01/20/2004 02:59:35 PM, Tanel Poder wrote: Hi! Note that when you set an event with alter system, it will only apply for new sessions created, not for any existing ones. And that, exactly is the problem. First, when you set event using alter system, the setting is system wide. Second, if you

RE: ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-20 Thread Bobak, Mark
You can also use DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_INT_PARAM_IN_SESSION and DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_BOOL_PARAM_IN_SESSION, in lieu of oradebug. -Mark Mark J. Bobak Oracle DBA ProQuest Company Ann Arbor, MI Imagination was given to man to compensate him for what he is not, and a sense of humor was provided to console him

Re: ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-20 Thread Tanel Poder
But you can't set events with it :( Tanel. - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 10:39 PM You can also use DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_INT_PARAM_IN_SESSION and DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_BOOL_PARAM_IN_SESSION, in lieu of oradebug.

RE: ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-20 Thread Bobak, Mark
For that, there is DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_EV. ;-) -Mark Mark J. Bobak Oracle DBA ProQuest Company Ann Arbor, MI Imagination was given to man to compensate him for what he is not, and a sense of humor was provided to console him for what he is. --Unknown -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday,

RE: ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-20 Thread Stephen Andert
One thing I've been looking for is a way to set a string parameter in another session, The two you mention handle INTEGER and BOOLEAN. I want a way to set TRACEFILE_IDENTIFIER to a string in another session to make it easier to identify trace files. Any ideas? Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-20 Thread Tanel Poder
Ok, yeap I confused this with READ_EV, which can't read event from other sessions... Great job ;) Tanel. - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 11:19 PM For that, there is DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_EV. ;-) -Mark Mark

FW: ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-20 Thread Bobak, Mark
WhoopsMeant to send this to the list, not just Stephen. Mark J. Bobak Oracle DBA ProQuest Company Ann Arbor, MI Imagination was given to man to compensate him for what he is not, and a sense of humor was provided to console him for what he is. --Unknown -Original Message- Sent:

Re: ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-20 Thread Mladen Gogala
On 01/20/2004 03:39:25 PM, Bobak, Mark wrote: You can also use DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_INT_PARAM_IN_SESSION and DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_BOOL_PARAM_IN_SESSION, in lieu of oradebug. Thanks, Mark! I've learned something from you today! Who says that one cannot teach an old bear new tricks. -- Please see the official

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-20 Thread Connor McDonald
below) VU_2exec testarray(1); begin testarray(1); end; * ERROR at line 1: ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1 ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 8144 bytes (cursor work he,qesaQBInit:buffer) ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find

RE: ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-19 Thread Norris, Gregory T [ITS]
scripts for an in-house application, which includes renaming an existing table, and creating a new version using the original name. No problem... or so I thought. :( All seems well under OEM and SQL+, but I have a developer who consistently gets an ORA-904 error (invalid column name) when trying

RE: ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-19 Thread Chris Stephens
an existing table, and creating a new version using the original name. No problem... or so I thought. :( All seems well under OEM and SQL+, but I have a developer who consistently gets an ORA-904 error (invalid column name) when trying to access the new table under TOAD. I can't think of anything weird

ORA-06505 PL/SQL: variable requires more than 32767 bytes of contiguous memory

2004-01-19 Thread Mudhalvan, Moovarkku
Dear DBAs, Good Morning. Using PL/SQL procedure I am trying to spool out Japanese Characters with VARCHR2(3600) size and I am getting this error. Here is my code. For your information it is Japanese Characters Spool c:\test.log Declare cursor c1 is select

RE: ORA-06505 PL/SQL: variable requires more than 32767 bytes of contiguous memory - Thank You !!!!!

2004-01-19 Thread Mudhalvan, Moovarkku
Dear Friends, (B (BThank you so much. Yes i was able to solve this issue.. (B (BFYI ... I used CONVERT function (B (B

Re: ora-1555 under automatic undo management (resend ?)

2004-01-16 Thread Richard Foote
I'm having an ora-1555 under Oracle9 database and not sure what I can do to get rid of it. I had some recollecions from Oracle8 days , but the things like adding a new rollback segment or shrinking the segments I don't think are applicable under the auto undo management. Besides separating

ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-16 Thread Norris, Gregory T [ITS]
We're developing some schema update scripts for an in-house application, which includes renaming an existing table, and creating a new version using the original name. No problem... or so I thought. :( All seems well under OEM and SQL+, but I have a developer who consistently gets an ORA-904

Re: ORA-904 after table rename

2004-01-16 Thread jo_holvoet
] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/16/2004 16:09 Please respond to ORACLE-L To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:ORA-904 after table rename We're developing some schema update scripts for an in-house application, which includes

ora-1555 under automatic undo management

2004-01-15 Thread Gurelei
Hi all: I'm having an ora-1555 under Oracle9 database and not sure what I can do to get rid of it. I had some recollecions from Oracle8 days , but the things like adding a new rollback segment or shrinking the segments I don't think are applicable under the auto undo management. Besides

Re: ORA-3113 errors after switching W2K server to new network

2004-01-12 Thread Paul Vincent
Success! I've now learnt, from our network security admin guy, that the Firewall Manager on the new network is configured by default to timeout inactive connections after 60 minutes. Even though all the user clients are inside the firewall, the server is specially ringfenced because the

RE: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-12 Thread Jeroen van Sluisdam
is that my original program works fine with pga_target = 0 and wa-size-policy=manual When I try this with this test-program it fails (see below) VU_2exec testarray(1); begin testarray(1); end; * ERROR at line 1: ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1 ORA-04030: out of process

RE: ORA-3113 errors after switching W2K server to new network

2004-01-12 Thread Norris, Gregory T [ITS]
Have you considered enabling DCD? This causes oracle to send pseudo-keepalive packets periodically, which should keep your sessions active from the firewall's perspective. You enable this by adding sqlnet.expire_time = ?? to sqlnet.ora on the DB server, where ?? is the frequency (in

Curious ORA-942 on DataDict Views in 8.1.7 with

2004-01-12 Thread Hemant K Chitale
Two custom views [DDFS_TOTAL on DBA_DATA_FILES, and FSH_TOTAL on DBA_FREE_SPACE] which I create in the DBSNMP schema are now failing with ORA-00942 after having set O7_DICTIONARY_ACCESSIBILITY=FALSE. The database is 8.1.7.4 32-bit on Solaris8. These views used to work

RE: ORA-3113 errors after switching W2K server to new network

2004-01-12 Thread Paul Drake
--- Norris, Gregory T [ITS] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you considered enabling DCD? Greg, short of migrating to *nix, dead connection detection does not work on win32. not in 8.1.7.4, not in 9.2.0.4. possibly in 10g? ;) Pd This causes oracle to send pseudo-keepalive packets

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-10 Thread Jonathan Lewis
' FAQ http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:34 PM Hi, I followed you advice and made small testprogram see below: I only get the ora-06500 which I have had before

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-10 Thread Ryan
-operative Oracle Users' FAQ http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:34 PM Hi, I followed you advice and made small testprogram see below: I only get the ora

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-10 Thread Jonathan Lewis
In the UGA, I should think (which also means the SGA if you are running MTS). It can't be in the PGA (ignoring the fact that the UGA is in the PGA for non-MTS) or you couldn't have global pl/sql tables that persist across database calls. Regards Jonathan Lewis http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-10 Thread Ryan
I have seen people bulk collect into pl/sql tables so much data that you cannot even connect to the server. So I'm assuming that ones the UGA fills up, Oracle will allocate whatever unused memory is left on the server for pl/sql tables? - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list

RE: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-10 Thread Bobak, Mark
to satisfy the demands, the user's session will encounter ORA-4031. In dedicated server, the UGA is allocated in the PGA. The user's session will allocate more private memory (by growing the PGA heap) from system memory. If/when the PL/SQL table grows so large as the process can no longer allocate

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-10 Thread Tim Gorman
://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:34 PM Hi, I followed you advice and made small testprogram see below: I only get the ora-06500 which I have had before in the original

RE: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-09 Thread Jeroen van Sluisdam
Hi, I followed you advice and made small testprogram see below: I only get the ora-06500 which I have had before in the original program as A followup error so to me it seems to be reproducible. In manuals I only find that the index Of a pl/sql table cannot be more than 2**31, which

ORA-3113 errors after switching W2K server to new network

2004-01-08 Thread Paul Vincent
reporting ORA-3113 errors (end of file on communiation channel). In every case, this happens after the user's connection has been inactive for somewhat over an hour. There are no messages in the database alert log, no trace files or dump files in the bdump, cdump or udump locations, and no messages

RE: ORA-3113 errors after switching W2K server to new network

2004-01-08 Thread Tim Onions
connect to the databases, and all appeared well. Until our users started reporting ORA-3113 errors (end of file on communiation channel). In every case, this happens after the user's connection has been inactive for somewhat over an hour. There are no messages in the database alert log, no trace files

Re: ORA-3113 errors after switching W2K server to new network

2004-01-08 Thread Paul Drake
Hi Paul, I'd start with reading Anita Bardeen's paper, available on the NYOUG site: http://www.nyoug.org/presentations.htm ORA-3113's, 600's and 7445's Oh My! Are these connections local, like on the same subnet, or is there a firewall or router in between that could be performing network

Re: ORA-01578 data block corrupted

2004-01-08 Thread Mogens Nørgaard
to see if they match. If not, it's probably a soft corruption. Or get Peter Gram to look at such stuff. He's crazy. Mogens Nguyen, David M wrote: I got ORA-01578 error while querrying info for below table. How do I fix this error? SQLSelect count(*) from GATEWAYCALLSTATS; * ERROR at line

Re: ORA-01578 data block corrupted

2004-01-08 Thread Tanel Poder
, David M wrote: I got ORA-01578 error while querrying info for below table. How do I fix this error? SQLSelect count(*) from GATEWAYCALLSTATS; * ERROR at line 2: ORA-01578: ORACLE* data block corrupted* (file # 3, block # 2683299) ORA-01110: data file 3: '/apps/oracle

pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-06 Thread Jeroen van Sluisdam
Hi, I have posted a problem before which I can only solve with a workaround but because I'm not getting satisdactory answers from Oracle I'm trying alternatives. - problem is a batch pl/sql package which ends with ora-4030 - batch runs fine on oracle 7.3.4, we migrated to oracle

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-06 Thread Jonathan Lewis
06, 2004 2:54 PM Hi, I have posted a problem before which I can only solve with a workaround but because I'm not getting satisdactory answers from Oracle I'm trying alternatives. - problem is a batch pl/sql package which ends with ora-4030 - batch runs fine on oracle 7.3.4

ORA-01578 data block corrupted

2004-01-06 Thread Nguyen, David M
Title: ORA-01578 data block corrupted I got ORA-01578 error while querrying info for below table. How do I fix this error? SQLSelect count(*) from GATEWAYCALLSTATS; * ERROR at line 2: ORA-01578: ORACLE data block corrupted (file # 3, block # 2683299) ORA-01110: data file 3: '/apps

Re: pga workarea and ora-04030

2004-01-06 Thread Tanel Poder
When I increase the pga_aggregate_target to 2Gb and the smm_max_size also the program fails around the following numbers from pgastat I'm not advocating fiddling with hidden parameters here, but there is one more parameter which limits PGA usage, it's _pga_max_size and defaults to 200M.

RE: ORA-01578 data block corrupted

2004-01-06 Thread Bobak, Mark
o man to compensate him for what he is not, and a sense of humor was provided to console him for what he is." --Unknown -Original Message-From: Nguyen, David M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 11:05 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:

RE: ORA-01578 data block corrupted

2004-01-06 Thread Potluri, Venu (CT Appl Suppt)
Title: ORA-01578 data block corrupted Run dbv on the datafile. Also there is a document on Metalink which describes how to handle data block corruption. Use the folliwng query to get segment name SELECT TABLESPACE_NAME, SEGMENT_TYPE, OWNER, SEGMENT_NAMEFROM DBA_EXTENTSWHERE FILE_ID

Re: ORA-01578 data block corrupted

2004-01-06 Thread Michael Boligan
: Sent by: Subject: ORA-01578 data block corrupted [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: ORA-01578 data block corrupted

2004-01-06 Thread Joe Testa
, January 06, 2004 11:05 AM *To:* Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L *Subject:* ORA-01578 data block corrupted I got ORA-01578 error while querrying info for below table. How do I fix this error? SQLSelect count(*) from GATEWAYCALLSTATS; * ERROR at line 2: ORA

ora 01548

2004-01-05 Thread Gene Gurevich
Hi. I getting ora-01548 error trying to drop an old undo tablespace under oracle 9204. I have shut down the database and brought it back (as metalink recommended), but I still see some segments created in the old undo tablespace and therefore I can't drop it. What could be the reason, does anyone

ORA-00600 signalled while mounting the database from the second instance of Oracle9i RAC

2003-12-23 Thread Ranganath K
Title: ORA-00600 signalled while mounting the database from the second instance of Oracle9i RAC Hi there, I have set up two-node Oracle9i RAC on Windows 2000 Advanced Server with OCFS (Oracle Clustered file system). The Oracle version is 9.2.0.1.0 and I have also applied the 9.2.0.3.0

ORA-00600 signalled while mounting the database from the second instance of Oracle9i RAC

2003-12-23 Thread Ranganath K
Title: ORA-00600 signalled while mounting the database from the second instance of Oracle9i RAC Hi there, I have set up two-node Oracle9i RAC on Windows 2000 Advanced Server with OCFS (Oracle Clustered file system). The Oracle version is 9.2.0.1.0 and I have also applied the 9.2.0.3.0

RE: ORA-00600 signaled while mounting the database from the second instance of Oracle9i RAC

2003-12-23 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Title: ORA-00600 signalled while mounting the database from the second instance of Oracle9i RAC Have you looked up on Metalink? there is ton of information out there. Raj Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot

ora-4030 pga memory allocation running wild

2003-12-23 Thread Jeroen van Sluisdam
Hi, I have an ora-4030 problem related to pga memory allocation, at least I have concluded sofar This program is batch written in pl/sql and after an hour or so it crashes. PGA allocated is slowly exceeding 2Gb and when I monitor with top I see the process size rising uptill 2 Gb

ora-942 message in alert log

2003-12-23 Thread Jeffrey Beckstrom
Yesterday, wereceived the below message in our alert log. Normally, we do not see such messages in an alert log.It might be a spurious message since in the associated trace file it first says: FATAL ERROR IN TWO-TASK SERVER: error = 12571 which is a networking error. Maybe just had a

ora-942 message in alert log

2003-12-23 Thread Jeffrey Beckstrom
Yesterday, wereceived the below message in our alert log. Normally, we do not see such messages in an alert log.It might be a spurious message since in the associated trace file it first says: FATAL ERROR IN TWO-TASK SERVER: error = 12571 which is a networking error. Maybe just had a

RE: ora-4030 pga memory allocation running wild

2003-12-23 Thread Khedr, Waleed
this memory except there is a major bug some where, which I doubt! Please keep us updated. Thanks Waleed -Original Message-From: Jeroen van Sluisdam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 10:24 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: ora-4030 pga

RE: ora-942 message in alert log

2003-12-23 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F
recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: ora-942 message in alert log Yesterday, wereceived the below message in our alert log. Normally, we do not see such messages in an alert log.It might be a spurious message since in the associated trace file it first says: FATAL ERROR IN TWO-TASK

Re: ora-4030 pga memory allocation running wild

2003-12-23 Thread Jared Still
I'm using auto pga allocation on 9.2.0.3 without any problem. You don't mention which version. You can turn it off with 'alter system set workarea_size_policy=manual; Jared On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 07:24, Jeroen van Sluisdam wrote: Hi, I have an ora-4030 problem related to pga memory

RE: ora-4030 pga memory allocation running wild

2003-12-23 Thread Jeroen van Sluisdam
Hi, I'm using oracle 9.2.0.4. I put it off tonight with the statement You mentioned and unfortunately no success. Maybe interesting to know that I started without the event 4030 set And I get the following ora-600 in my alert file: Tue Dec 23 16:46:42 2003 Errors in file /var/opt/oracle/product

ORA-00600:arguments: [kdibc3position

2003-12-22 Thread Gene Gurevich
Hi. I'm getting ora 6000 error with the kdibc3position argument in a prod DB. I have read some information on that issue on the metalink, but the only workaround that I seem to have found was to drop and rebuild the bitmap indices on the table. I couldn't see any info as to how to prevent

ORA-1652: temp segment in tablespace SYSTEM ?!?

2003-12-18 Thread Sands, Robyn
--_=_NextPart_001_01C3C583.D0824CB6 Content-Type: text/plain hey everyone ... The developers are loading blobs over database links. One of the 24 subsets of data is failing with the following error: ORA-1652: unable to extend temp segment by 512 in tablespace SYSTEM The subset

RE: ORA-1652: temp segment in tablespace SYSTEM ?!?

2003-12-18 Thread Guang Mei
of this message may not be legible. --_=_NextPart_001_01C3C583.D0824CB6 Content-Type: text/plain hey everyone ... The developers are loading blobs over database links. One of the 24 subsets of data is failing with the following error: ORA-1652: unable to extend temp segment by 512

RE: ORA-1652: temp segment in tablespace SYSTEM ?!?

2003-12-18 Thread Sands, Robyn
-Type: text/plain hey everyone ... The developers are loading blobs over database links. One of the 24 subsets of data is failing with the following error: ORA-1652: unable to extend temp segment by 512 in tablespace SYSTEM The subset that is failing is reading a large amount of MRP data

RE: ORA-1652: temp segment in tablespace SYSTEM ?!?

2003-12-18 Thread Sami
... The developers are loading blobs over database links. One of the 24 subsets of data is failing with the following error: ORA-1652: unable to extend temp segment by 512 in tablespace SYSTEM The subset that is failing is reading a large amount of MRP data. The error occurs in the instance

After 256 connections : ORA-12154

2003-12-16 Thread jaysingh1
it? Exception in thread main java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve service name at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Native Method) at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Compiled Code) at java.lang.Throwable.init(Compiled Code

RE: After 256 connections : ORA-12154

2003-12-16 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
or on a webserver. This program opens many simultaneous connections to the database. The following error occurs on or near the 257th connection: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve service name All of the following symptoms apply: - Solaris OS - Oracle JDBC/OCI driver - ORA

RE: After 256 connections : ORA-12154

2003-12-16 Thread Odland, Brad
is easily reproducible bt writing simple java program and keep creating connections(do not close it). Did anyone encounter this kind of issue and how did you solve it? Exception in thread main java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve service name

RE: After 256 connections : ORA-12154

2003-12-16 Thread Bobak, Mark
Hmm...my first thought is that this could be an OS/network configuration limitation on the client side? Though it does seem odd to raise an ORA-12154, after many successful connections What OS is the client? -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 2:39 PM To: Multiple

Re: After 256 connections : ORA-12154

2003-12-16 Thread Mladen Gogala
in the neck. Hopefully, I will be better off. On 12/16/2003 02:59:33 PM, Bobak, Mark wrote: Hmm...my first thought is that this could be an OS/network configuration limitation on the client side? Though it does seem odd to raise an ORA-12154, after many successful connections What OS

RE: After 256 connections : ORA-12154

2003-12-16 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
it). Did anyone encounter this kind of issue and how did you solve it? Exception in thread main java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve service name at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Native Method) at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Compiled Code

RE: After 256 connections : ORA-12154

2003-12-16 Thread Sami
. The following error occurs on or near the 257th connection: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve service name All of the following symptoms apply: - Solaris OS - Oracle JDBC/OCI driver - ORA-12154 Error - Failure occurs on 257th connection between JDBC client and Oracle server. - Same

RE: After 256 connections : ORA-12154

2003-12-16 Thread Sami
it? Exception in thread main java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve service name at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Native Method) at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Compiled Code) at java.lang.Throwable.init(Compiled Code

RE: ORA-21779: duration not active

2003-12-14 Thread M Rafiq
for certain session time limt... Regards Rafiq Bug 2556295 SDO_INTERSECTION fails with large GEOMETRIES (ORA-21779) This note gives a brief overview of bug 2556295. Affects: Product (Component) Oracle Spatial (SDO) Range of versions believed to be affected Versions 10G Versions confirmed

RE: ORA-21779: duration not active

2003-12-14 Thread Sami
GEOMETRIES (ORA-21779) This note gives a brief overview of bug 2556295. Affects: Product (Component) Oracle Spatial (SDO) Range of versions believed to be affected Versions 10G Versions confirmed as being affected 9.2.0.3 9.2.0.4 Platforms affected Generic (all / most platforms affected) Fixed

RE: ORA-21779: duration not active

2003-12-14 Thread M Rafiq
for this sesion which may be avoided...meaning have you assigned any profile to that user running export for certain session time limt... Regards Rafiq Bug 2556295 SDO_INTERSECTION fails with large GEOMETRIES (ORA-21779) This note gives a brief overview of bug 2556295. Affects: Product (Component

Re: ORA-02045 on 8.1.7.0.0

2003-12-08 Thread Yechiel Adar
got an Oracle 8.1.7 installation on Sun Solaris 8 (sparc). We use some database management software which gegerates several select-statements going over ten database users. After some seconds (everytime in another db-user and another table), the system prints out the following error: ORA-02045

ORA-02045 on 8.1.7.0.0

2003-12-05 Thread Elmar Hartung
and another table), the system prints out the following error: ORA-02045: too many local sessions participating in global transaction ORA-02063: preceding line from STGTSU What's up here? greetz Elmar -- +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++ Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS

RE: dbua ORA-12545

2003-12-05 Thread Paula_Stankus
Running dbua to upgrade 8.1.7 to 9.2.0 database produces: ORA-12545: Connect failed because target host or object does not exist. Very annoying because looking at logs under .../assistants subdirectories and ../admin/upgrade/logs or the alert log - directories doesn't show what the missing

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >