RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-24 Thread Jared . Still
To:Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i =) Sorry... MKS makes Windows think it is Unix based. There is a free version ... similar to MKS but another name... that is supposed to be useable, but I have never used

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-24 Thread April Wells
:44 PM Please respond to ORACLE-L To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i=) Sorry... MKS makes Windows think it is Unix based. There is a free version

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-24 Thread Nelson, Allan
to ORACLE-L To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i=) Sorry... MKS makes Windows think it is Unix based. There is a free version ... similar to MKS but another

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-24 Thread Bonnie Finke
encoded content removed -- binaries not allowed by ListGuru The previous attachment was filtered out by the ListGuru mailing software at fatcity.com because binary attachments are not appropriate for mailing lists. If you want a copy of the attachment which was removed, contact the sender

Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-24 Thread Tanel Poder
missing those. Tanel. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:49 PM Subject: RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i My question was not clear. I realize what MKS et al are, but what I really

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-24 Thread Jesse, Rich
Sounds like OiD. You can't install it on Windows unless you have a Unixish shell to do it in because of the command line utils like ldifwrite. As usual, this was on v9.0.1... Rich Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-24 Thread April Wells
recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i They are required for installation and running 11i successfully on windows. As someone mentioned here, if relinking is needed for example. Also some concurrent jobs interacting with OS might be using MKS. IIRC, you can't even pass

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-24 Thread Nelson, Allan
Title: Message Probably meaning cygwin. -Original Message-From: April Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 2:25 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i You can fake it out, though, if you get the free

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-24 Thread April Wells
Adam Wells age 11 -Original Message-From: Nelson, Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 2:35 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i Probably meaning cygwin. -Original Message-From: April

Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-24 Thread Tanel Poder
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:34 PM Subject: RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i Probably meaning cygwin. -Original Message-From: April Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 2:25 PMTo: Multiple

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-24 Thread April Wells
-LSubject: Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i Aha, thats a good idea. But Apps loses support probably if you're using cygwin or anything else than MKS. (Btw, I wouldn't call it Unix on windows, it's just a unix toolset runnable on windows). Tanel. - Original Message - From

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-24 Thread Rodd Holman
a kite Adam Wells age 11 -Original Message- From: Tanel Poder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 2:10 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-23 Thread babette.turnerunderwood
of bugs. -- Kernighan [EMAIL PROTECTED] s.comTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i .com

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-23 Thread Ron Thomas
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-23 Thread Boivin, Patrice J
uncovers a new class of bugs. -- Kernighan [EMAIL PROTECTED] s.comTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-23 Thread April Wells
Title: RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i Comes with a Database, Babette... you probably can't use the update... I would say... $55.93 Oracle Applications 11i Release 9 CD Pack for MS Windows. Do a single tier install and be prepared for one hour install to take the biggest part of a day... A lot has

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-23 Thread Jared . Still
:RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i Comes with a Database, Babette... you probably can't use the update... I would say... $55.93 Oracle Applications 11i Release 9 CD Pack for MS Windows. Do a single tier install and be prepared for one hour install to take the biggest part of a day... A lot has changed since

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-23 Thread April Wells
Title: RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i =) Sorry... MKS makes Windows think it is Unix based. There is a free version ... similar to MKS but another name... that is supposed to be useable, but I have never used it. It lets you use all of the Unix commands, and lets cloning and patching work

Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-23 Thread Tanel Poder
Title: RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i Yep, MKS is basically a bunch of unix shell tools for windows, like cygwin32, but you have to pay for it. Very correct recommendation about setting paths short, I ran into some bugs problems with 11.5.4 few years ago, when path was too long (1024 bytes

Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-20 Thread Tanel Poder
by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i .com 09/19/2003 04:54 PM Please respond to ORACLE-L Ron, We are 'in the process

Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-20 Thread Tim Gorman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i .com 09/19/2003 04:54 PM Please respond

Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-20 Thread Tanel Poder
Hi! You're absolutely right. I had really meant to say that the 8.0.6 software stack finally goes away, but stated it poorly. Unfortunately, I was wrong even there, as the 8.0.6 software stack remains, as you've indicated. All I can say is that I was in the db-tier environment when looking

Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-20 Thread Ron Thomas
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i .com

Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-20 Thread Tanel Poder
PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i .com 09/20/2003 03:59 AM Please respond to ORACLE-L Tim, The FormsReports are still there, the main part of Apps will continue

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-19 Thread John Kanagaraj
Ron, We are 'in the process' of moving from 11.5.7/8.1.7.4 to 11.5.8/9.2.0.4 - planning/testing starts after approval. We went ahead and installed a test db in any case. Make sure that you start out with 9.2.0.4 - the older 9.2.0.3 is buggy and Oracle seems to have ratified .4 recently. John

RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-19 Thread Ron Thomas
PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i .com

Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-19 Thread Tim Gorman
] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i .com 09/19/2003 04:54 PM Please respond

Re: Apps 11.5.8 and 9i

2003-09-18 Thread Tanel Poder
I'd say you won't get too much performance improvements, because 11i is still optimized and will remain optimized for 8i, even lower in some cases, because it still uses 8.0 client libraries. (thus isn't using 9i construct such merge for example). You could get some performance improvements