RE: FW: Sun sets Solaris x86 free

2003-12-16 Thread Boivin, Patrice J
Mladen, I notice that the linux vendors are charging for their distributions... The free linux argument doesn't hold true anymore, in my opinion. Patrice. -Original Message- Sent: December 15, 2003 8:29 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L On 2003.12.15 07:09, Boivin, Patrice

RE: FW: Sun sets Solaris x86 free

2003-12-16 Thread Boivin, Patrice J
Linux is just not an option in some environments. : ) Patrice -Original Message- Sent: December 15, 2003 9:24 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L That's right, it is just another crap. I would rather use Linux instead of Solarix for x86. - Original Message - To:

Re: FW: Sun sets Solaris x86 free

2003-12-15 Thread Mladen Gogala
On 2003.12.15 07:09, Boivin, Patrice J wrote: Now if Oracle could release a version of its products for Solaris x86. Why would you use it? So that SUN can, at Scott McNealy's whim, start charging for it? What is needed is not yet another Unix for x86, support for already existing public domain

Re: FW: Sun sets Solaris x86 free

2003-12-15 Thread Eric King
That's right, it is just another crap. I would rather use Linux instead of Solarix for x86. - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 07:29 On 2003.12.15 07:09, Boivin, Patrice J wrote: Now if Oracle could