Hi,
you can use this query:
select from Person where $parents containsAll (@rid in $current.in_Child)
and $parents.size() = in('Child').size() and @rid<>#11:3
let $parents= (select expand(in('Child')) from #11:3)
Regards,
Alessandro
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed
Okay, I think it is starting to make sense. If my understanding is correct,
when you are within the containsall expression, you are 'working with' each
person record from the current 'children' rid collection? So when you are
checking the 'married' property, it is actually checking
children[0].
Hi,
This example should help :
select from Person where children contains ( married = true )
// select people who have at least one child with married = true
select from Person where children containsAll ( married = true )
// select people who have all the children with married = true
Regards,
A
Thanks for the reply. I never noticed it until now, when I am trying to do
something similar again.
I understand what you are saying, but I can't fathom the syntax. Can you
give an example?
On Thursday, 14 May 2015 12:31:47 UTC+8, Ziink A wrote:
>
> I know this is a very late response but it's
I know this is a very late response but it's mostly for someone who's
looking as I was.
ContainsAll implies that the collection on the left 'contains all' the
items on the right.
THAT IS NOT SO.
On the right of CONTAINSALL should be a condition. All elements in the set
on the left must satis
