Hi Giraldo,
Could you take a look here
https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/wiki/plocal-storage-components#wiki-cluster
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Giraldo Rosales nitr...@gmail.com wrote:
Has there been an official update to the reuse issue in plocal? Is there a
setting to
Hi,
Can you help me understand a bit here :).
1. I have a root vertext class with defined property and a
non_unique_hasindex defined against that property.
rootVertexType = tenantGraph.createVertexType(typeName);
rootVertexType.createProperty(property,
Artem Orobets, you understand my proposition?
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
OrientDB group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to orient-database+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options,
Giraldo,
It is controversial issues, there are doubts that rid reuse will reduce
ability to scale database also local storage will be deprecated soon.
What is your problem with RID reuse ?
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Giraldo Rosales nitr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. I read this. Great
Hi,
From Android using REST need to store an image. A quick sample code is
appreciated how to store in OrientDB. Urgent :)
Regards,
CG
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
OrientDB group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
For a customer, I have a use case where more than 5 records are
deleted and re-created every night by batch. Not reuse RID can be a
problem here.
Ideally I think we should have a customizable interface RidFactory
with 3 default implementations : never reuse, reuse immediately,
reuse
Hi,
Local storage deprecation is planned. I don't know when and in which
version.
In our software, we will add an automatic migration from old local db
to the new plocal. But we can not impose on all our customers to
migrate to a precise version. Generally they jump 2 or 3 versions (2 - 4
That would be a great solution. Or even if it's an eventual reuse. Where if
and when the RIDs run out (I am aware the limit is far beyond trillions),
the database will start from 0 again and reuse any unused RIDs.
Andrey,
The fact that local will be deprecated helps in choosing the right option
So as I can see it the problem is not rid reuse but space reuse, does not
it ?
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Giraldo Rosales nitr...@gmail.com wrote:
That would be a great solution. Or even if it's an eventual reuse. Where
if and when the RIDs run out (I am aware the limit is far beyond
Correct. Just wanted peace of mind if we keep the database clean on the app
side, we could have unlimited RIDs.
So if hundreds of thousands of RIDs are deleted on a regular basis, those
RIDs are not gone for good. They would be reused sometime in the future.
The longer the period between reuse,
Hello,
Our project has a dependency upon the orientdb-distribution artifact which
was previously available for 1.5.1. It seems after moving to 1.6.4 this
artifact is no longer being made available. We used the distribution
artifact to obtain the orientd studio and embed it within our
Le 27/01/2014 15:06, Andrey Lomakin a écrit :
So as I can see it the problem is not rid reuse but space reuse, does
not it ?
You're right, for my use case, the problem is space reuse.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups OrientDB group.
To
Hi all,
I'm trying to call a Gremlin command with some parameter, but I have no
idea how to indacate parameter in query and how pass parameters to the
executor.
This is what I do, but I have
java.lang.Integer cannot be cast to java.lang.String
g.command(new OCommandGremlin(g.V('@class',
Hi,
It is not problem in 1.6.4 I suggest you to wait for 1.6.5 and then do
update.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Rob Gratz gratz@gmail.com wrote:
I believe they are using 1.6.
On Jan 24, 2014 11:30 AM, Andrey Lomakin lomakin.and...@gmail.com
wrote:
HI,
Which version do you use ?
Hi Stefan,
It is a bug could you open issue, we will fix it in 1.6.5.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:59 PM, ste...@activitystream.com wrote:
Hi,
Can you help me understand a bit here :).
1. I have a root vertext class with defined property and a
non_unique_hasindex defined against that
15 matches
Mail list logo
