> On Apr 15, 2023, at 9:48 AM, David Mitchell via Origami
> wrote:
>
> Laura R wrote:
>
>> I?ll be happy to help editing that Wiki entry. I contribute that way with
>> Wiki from time to time fixing what my scatologic husband calls Wiki text
>> poop. As I?m not a modular expert and my
Laura R wrote:
>I?ll be happy to help editing that Wiki entry. I contribute that way with Wiki
>from time to time fixing what my scatologic husband calls Wiki text poop. As
>I?m not a modular expert and my English is not perfect, I will need the text
>to replace that part. You can communicate
>
> The distinction is important, I think. The Wikipedia article on Modular
> Origami says 'When modules are put together, most are supported only by the
> friction of paper' which is entirely untrue. See
> https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modular_origami. Actually this is possibly
> a
"gera...@neorigami.com" wrote:
>Most boxes and lids also benefit from friction
Ah, yes, some modular designs may indeed 'benefit from friction' (and I agree
that the Butterfly Ball is a good example of this) but this does not
necessarily make them 'friction-based'.
The distinction is
> On 13 Apr 2023, at 20.21, Chris killeen via Origami
> wrote:
>
> I like Tant for Modulars. Plus it has the added benefit of being the same
> color on both sides.
Tant is indeed good for butterfly bombs. Chosing 4 mathing Tant colours is nice.
Some of the stiffer varieties of washi are
I like Tant for Modulars. Plus it has the added benefit of being the same color on both sides. Sent from my iPhoneOn Apr 12, 2023, at 10:50 PM, gera...@neorigami.com wrote:In his most recent answer to my thread, David asked or examples of friction-based modulars.I know I had read about that
In his most recent answer to my thread, David asked or examples of
friction-based modulars.
I know I had read about that before, maybe here on the list or somewhere else
on the web. Now, I don't claim for it to be a stablished category of modulars,
But there are some modulars that don't have
"gera...@neorigami.com" wrote:
>In his answer, Dave Mitchell asked me to explain what I mean with
>"friction-based modulars".
>Maybe there's another name for that, but I'm referring to modulars which units
>stay together thanks to the friction generated between them.
I asked because it's not
In his answer, Dave Mitchell asked me to explain what I mean with
"friction-based modulars".
Maybe there's another name for that, but I'm referring to modulars which units
stay together thanks to the friction generated between them.
--
Gerardo G.
gerardo(a)neorigami.com
gerardo(a)neorigami.com asked:
>What very common paper in? the origami community do you recommend for
>friction-based modulars?
Can you explain what a friction-based modular is?
Dave
HELLO EVERYONE
First of all, thank you Ron and Joann for helping me identify the paper in the
picture. I appreciate it very much.
Can you all please help me with another question? What very common paper in
the origami community do you recommend for friction-based modulars?
As always, you can
11 matches
Mail list logo
