On 8 Jul 2021, at 9:06, Gerardo @neorigami.com wrote:
>
> In her email, on Monday the 5th, Lisa B. Corfman mentioned we need a
> world-wide accepted definition of the concept "traditional origami". Lisa
> suggested to start by asking different origami platforms for general input,
> and then
In her email, on Monday the 5th, *Lisa B. Corfman* mentioned we need a
world-wide accepted definition of the concept "traditional origami". Lisa
suggested to start by asking different origami platforms for general input,
and then ask world-wide origami societies to come to an agreement embodied
in
Hans wrote:
>I believe the most extensive attempt at collecting "traditional models" is
>that of David Petty:
>http://britishorigami.info/academic/davidpetty//index.htm. For all I know, he
>is right about that list
Dave's methodology in creating this list was to look through books and to
wrote:
>I think it would be extremely helpful and important to define the term
>"Traditional" in a way that is accepted worldwide. A personal note is that
>the term traditional is a term I still do not have a clear understanding of
>>its meaning and I am an active member of the OUSA
> On 5 Jul 2021, at 15.11, l...@origamiplace.com wrote:
> I think it would be extremely helpful and important to define the term
> “Traditional” in a way that is accepted worldwide.
> I believe there should be something to clearly state that traditional models
> are in the creative commons if
