This can be complex as you have to indicate which relation to use. Does it
only work for simple cases?
For instance below you have three relations to the field person.name
1. one direct
2. via father
3. via mother
Table person(name, father_fk, mother_fk);
Translating to:
class person {
I guess I'm using neither.
The clue is that, when you stick to the rules, you have to write the minimum one panel
and one table
per dataobject as all the access to the properties is done via methods and each of
those methods is
specific for the dataobjects (e.g. getName(), setName(x)). When
I just received JBuilder 4 Enterprise and I will say that it does an
amazing job at EJB so far. You can connect to a datasource via JDBC and
pick your tables and keys for Entity CMP. It's amazing.
I'm still tweaking the deployment descriptors for Orion.
Man the money you can save on Orion
Hi Cory,
How do they recognize relations between tables?
Frank
On Tuesday, November 07, 2000 3:32 PM, Cory Adams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
I just received JBuilder 4 Enterprise and I will say that it does an
amazing job at EJB so far. You can connect to a datasource via JDBC and
It appears as though you can define/select any number of tables and or
fields from different tables to define what makes up the fields within an
entity bean.
Cory
At 10:12 PM 11/7/00 +0100, Frank Eggink wrote:
Hi Cory,
How do they recognize relations between tables?
Frank
On Tuesday,
I'm using Swing instead of JSP.
On Sunday, November 05, 2000 9:04 PM, Cory Adams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Thanks for that update.
Do you or does anyone else know of the MVC (model - view - control) pattern
used with JSP - Servlets and EJB? I have read that a single servlet
becomes
Are you using the command or business object pattern?
At 08:49 AM 11/6/00 +0100, Frank Eggink wrote:
I'm using Swing instead of JSP.
On Sunday, November 05, 2000 9:04 PM, Cory Adams
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Thanks for that update.
Do you or does anyone else know of the MVC (model -
My personal trade off was:
Why not CMP 2.0 style:
- Too scared to use it for real as it is not even officially there ...
Why choose for CMP 1.1?
- CMP is more portable (across db's).
- Working already towards EJB2.0.
- The claim is CMP can be optimized better (I would be happy to know more
At 22:23 05.11.00 , you wrote:
My personal trade off was:
Why not CMP 2.0 style:
- Too scared to use it for real as it is not even officially there ...
Why choose for CMP 1.1?
- CMP is more portable (across db's).
- Working already towards EJB2.0.
- The claim is CMP can be optimized better (I
Thanks for that update.
Do you or does anyone else know of the MVC (model - view - control) pattern
used with JSP - Servlets and EJB? I have read that a single servlet
becomes that controlling mechanism to the EJBs. I wondering how that is
done?
Cory
At 10:23 PM 11/5/00 +0100, Frank Eggink
A
Hmmm. I can find even less regarding 1.1 CMP. I have the ORielly book
as well as the Mastering EJB books. The 2.0 spec is what I'm using because
I would think (perhaps wrongly) that EJB 2.0 would maybe be easier and or
offer more functionality??? Chapters 9 and 10 are over 100 pages
I have looked through the 2.0 spec and find the chapters regarding CMP to
be daunting. It appears as though the complexity of writing my own SQL in
BMP has to be balanced against learning an entire new way of managin
persistence within the XML deployment descriptors which seems to be no less
or
At 11:23 03.11.00 , you wrote:
I have looked through the 2.0 spec and find the chapters regarding CMP to
be daunting. It appears as though the complexity of writing my own SQL in
BMP has to be balanced against learning an entire new way of managin
persistence within the XML deployment
At 11:44 PM 11/3/00 +0100, Robert Krueger wrote:
At 11:23 03.11.00 , you wrote:
I have looked through the 2.0 spec and find the chapters regarding CMP to
be daunting. It appears as though the complexity of writing my own SQL in
BMP has to be balanced against learning an entire new way of managin
14 matches
Mail list logo
