If
anybody is at JAOO this week, please ask Karl about this.
Regards,
the
elephantwalker
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Solinsky,
JasonSent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:01 AMTo:
Orion-InterestSubject: EJB 2.0
I have empirically observed a very high penalty on each call I make through
a remote interface in the same JVM in 1.5.2. I haven't attempted to figure
out how things are actually implemented, but something very expensive is
happening each time a same-VM call is made.
JWS
-Original
Has it
been declared approved formally? Or does the ballots suggest that it is going to
be approved?
Has
any of the app server vendors come out with plans in rolling out their EJB2.0
servers?
Satish
-Original Message-From: Solinsky, Jason
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday,
ubject: RE: EJB 2.0
Approved
Has
it been declared approved formally? Or does the ballots suggest that it is
going to be approved?
Has
any of the app server vendors come out with plans in rolling out their EJB2.0
servers?
Satish
-Original Message-From: Solin
It's still officially in PFD status but will be approved with the release of J2EE 1.3
coming out,
as I understand it. I believe BEA rolled it out with WebLogic 6.1. Pramati has it too.
Others will
roll it out in the upcoming months - I assume Orion will be one of them.
--- GUNDA, Satish /
I'm pretty sure Orion does not perform their version of EJBLocal without
setting orion-ejb-jar copy-by-value=false in the orion-ejb-jar of the
EJB. Setting this attribute will stop objects from being serialized passed
between the EJB and the client. I am 99.9% sure that Orion does not perform
I understand that BEA will support it in version 6 which should be
available real-soon-now.
Steven
-Original Message-
From: satish.gunda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:44 AM
To: orion-interest
Subject: RE: EJB 2.0 Approved
Has it been declared
