Patrick wrote:
>Yes, but I myself won't have time before tomorrow. Congwu, what is the
>right invocation of client-test to trigger the endless 222 loop with
>Funambol, assuming that the loop detection is removed? I want to
>double-check that the real loop is still detected.
CLIENT_TEST_RESEND=t, CL
Hello Lukas!
Thanks a million for working on this over the weekend.
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 02:50 -0700, Lukas Zeller wrote:
> Patrick, can you verify the patch solves the delete case you ran into?
Yes, but I myself won't have time before tomorrow. Congwu, what is the
right invocation of client-te
Hello,
I just posted a fix for the client-side alert 222 loop detection,
using the idea Patrick suggested: 15a60aa254 (Alert 222 loop detector
improved: do not trigger as long as valid status is received) on
synthesis indefero, master, unilib, luz branches.
The counter is now reset whenev
