Re: [osg-users] Destruction order for static objects

I have now checked out and built the current OSG trunk, and can report that statically built OSG now terminates properly without any errors in both debug and release. Thank you very much for your help. :-) Your RenderBin_195.cpp hotfix, however, causes an compile error when incorporating it

Re: [osg-users] Destruction order for static objects

I've just discovered a potential solution for the initialization order for static objects. You can use the depends_on-pattern to let your classes inherit their dependencies. http://www.entropygames.net/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid=52 I don't know the OSG code enough in detail to

Re: [osg-users] Destruction order for static objects

I agree that my proposed fix is limited to s_renderBinPrototypeList, and similar problems from other static objects can surface at a later time. However, I fear that I can prove difficult to create an elegant infrastructure for ordering the construction of static objects in a bullet-proof way.

Re: [osg-users] Destruction order for static objects

It appears that others are also experiencing RenderBinPrototypeList destruction problems when building osg as a static lib: http://lists.openscenegraph.org/pipermail/osg-users-openscenegraph.org/2009-April/026550.html -- Read this topic online here:

Re: [osg-users] Destruction order for static objects

I have now debugged the problem a bit, and it does indeed manifest itself under both Win32 debug and release builds. The root of the problem is that the static s_renderBinPrototypeList object (osgUtil/RenderBin.cpp line 44) is being created before the static s_ReferencedGlobalMutext object

Re: [osg-users] Destruction order for static objects

Oooops Please disregard the suggestion in my previous posting. What I meant to suggest was: -- static RenderBinPrototypeList* renderBinPrototypeList() { osg::Referenced::getGlobalReferencedMutex(); static osg::ref_ptrRenderBinPrototypeList s_renderBinPrototypeList = new

[osg-users] Destruction order for static objects

, but this does not seem to make any difference. Configuration: OSG 2.8.1, built with static OSG and OT libs. on MS visual C++ 9/2008 SP1. Thanks in advance, Fredrik Orderud Rctl3dApp.exe!OpenThreads::Mutex::lock() Line 111 + 0xc bytes C++ Rctl3dApp.exe!OpenThreads