Re: [osg-users] Does OSG still build against Qt 4.8.7?

2016-03-25 Thread MacPorts
Hi Christian, CORRECTION: in that specific case there is only Qt4 installed on the machine. In this case OSG won't even configure properly. OSG got installed "properly". I mean that the dependent project which I was trying to build didn't configure properly, simply because the libosgqt

Re: [osg-users] Does OSG still build against Qt 4.8.7?

2016-03-24 Thread MacPorts
Hi Christian, On 23.03.2016 08:54, Christian Schulte wrote: Hi Marko, sorry, but I'm not familiar at all with the Macport's portfile system, so I may not bee of big help for you... You say that only Qt4 is installed so what do you mean by Qt5 variant works ? in that specific case there is

Re: [osg-users] Binary packages for Windows available?

2016-02-20 Thread MacPorts
Funny, today I decided to post this question and after having done so I realize that there are two very recent threads dealing with exactly that. So, sorry for the noise!!! ___ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org

[osg-users] Binary packages for Windows available?

2016-02-20 Thread MacPorts
Hi OSG folks, I was wondering whether somewhere official binary packages are available... There are quite a few links on the internet, but they all end up in 404! :-( Any hints? Greets, Marko ___ osg-users mailing list

Re: [osg-users] How to correctly build OSG 3.4.0 on OSX 10.10 with Qt5 support?

2016-02-18 Thread MacPorts
This is doing its job --- configure.args-append -DOSG_CONFIG_HAS_BEEN_RUN_BEFORE=YES \ -DOSG_DEFAULT_IMAGE_PLUGIN_FOR_OSX=imageio \ -DOSG_WINDOWING_SYSTEM=Cocoa \ -DOSG_USE_QT:BOOL=OFF variant qt5 description "with Qt5

[osg-users] How to correctly build OSG 3.4.0 on OSX 10.10 with Qt5 support?

2016-02-14 Thread MacPorts
Hi OSG folks, how to I build OSG 3.4.0 on OSX 10.10 with Qt5 support correctly? I have tried - using MacPorts - these options for a qt5 variant of a locally already existing and building 3.4.0 port: --- configure.args-append -DOSG_CONFIG_HAS_BEEN_RUN_BEFORE=YES