On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 09:33 +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> Hi Mathias, Grahame,
>
> Mathias Fröhlich writes:
> > There is a configure time switch in gcc that changes the default
> > architecture.
> > Distributions usually have their compiler configured for something that
> > includes support f
Hi Mathias, Grahame,
Mathias Fröhlich writes:
> Good morning,
>
> On Monday 04 April 2011, Grahame Bowland wrote:
>> `__sync_bool_compare_and_swap_4' src.cxx:(.text+0x78): undefined reference
>> to `__sync_bool_compare_and_swap_4' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> gmake[1]: *** [cmTryCompile
Good morning,
On Monday 04 April 2011, Grahame Bowland wrote:
> `__sync_bool_compare_and_swap_4' src.cxx:(.text+0x78): undefined reference
> to `__sync_bool_compare_and_swap_4' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> gmake[1]: *** [cmTryCompileExec] Error 1
> gmake: *** [cmTryCompileExec/fast] Erro
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:06 +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> > The gcc _OPENTHREADS_ATOMIC_USE_GCC_BUILTINS test should pass for both
> > gcc 4.4.3 and 4.5.2. I used plenty of gcc versions prior to 4.4.3 and
> > it worked fine. I'm currently using gcc 4.4.5 on this system and it
> > pick up on _OP
Robert Osfield writes:
> Hi Grahame,
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Grahame Bowland
> wrote:
>> Thanks very much, that was it! gcc-4.4.3 was failing the
>> _OPENTHREADS_ATOMIC_USE_GCC_BUILTINS test, which succeeded for 4.5.2.
>> That changed the "Atomic" header file, which presumably changed
Hi Grahame,
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Grahame Bowland
wrote:
> Thanks very much, that was it! gcc-4.4.3 was failing the
> _OPENTHREADS_ATOMIC_USE_GCC_BUILTINS test, which succeeded for 4.5.2.
> That changed the "Atomic" header file, which presumably changed the size
> of a bunch of importan
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 11:49 +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> Grahame Bowland writes:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > I'm shipping a version of OpenSceneGraph to users which has been
> > compiled with G++ 4.4.3. I've also compiled my app with this version of
> > G++.
> >
> > I'm now compiling the same OpenScene
"Melanie Presa" writes:
> I'm just worried incase I get so far down the line with my application, need
> to use a 3rd party library which won't work with the compiler Qt requires.
> Looks like I might have some flexibility in updating it then...
Well, the first thing is to check that both build
I'm just worried incase I get so far down the line with my application, need to
use a 3rd party library which won't work with the compiler Qt requires. Looks
like I might have some flexibility in updating it then...
--
Read this topic online here:
http://forum.openscenegraph.org/
Grahame Bowland writes:
> Hi all
>
> I'm shipping a version of OpenSceneGraph to users which has been
> compiled with G++ 4.4.3. I've also compiled my app with this version of
> G++.
>
> I'm now compiling the same OpenSceneGraph source code (2.8.2-rc4) with g
> ++ 4.5.2. Running my g++ 4.4.3 compi
Hi Grahame,
Might the binary compatibility been broken between g++ 4.4.3 and 4.5.2?
In terms of a different g++ version causing problems directly in the
OSG code base, I'd suspect a bug in the compiler before a bug in the
OSG, as the OSG is used with a wide range of compilers without showing
sign
Hi all
I'm shipping a version of OpenSceneGraph to users which has been
compiled with G++ 4.4.3. I've also compiled my app with this version of
G++.
I'm now compiling the same OpenSceneGraph source code (2.8.2-rc4) with g
++ 4.5.2. Running my g++ 4.4.3 compiled application against this library
cr
12 matches
Mail list logo
