Hi, Ulrich
this solution hides from user baseclass set(*T pointer) function which takes
pointer as parameter, so i would rather choose something different
Cheers
27.04.2012, 05:24, Ulrich Hertlein u.hertl...@sandbox.de:
Hi Sergey,
On 26/04/12 23:39 , Sergey Polischuk wrote:
Replying to
Hi Sergery,
2012/4/26 Sergey Polischuk pol...@yandex.ru:
Problem is: declaration of set(...) methods in derived Matrix*Template
classes hides base class MatrixTemplate::set(...) pack of methods
This can be solved by adding line:
using MatrixTemplate[template params]::set;
in each
Hi Ulrich,
On 27 April 2012 02:24, Ulrich Hertlein u.hertl...@sandbox.de wrote:
Matrix2Template( const Matrix2Template mat ) { base_class::set(mat.ptr()); }
Could you try that and submit a patch if it works?
I tried the above and it works, but as Sergey mentions the template
still hides the
Hi All,
On 27 April 2012 10:27, Robert Osfield robert.osfi...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried the above and it works, but as Sergey mentions the template
still hides the base_class::set(...) so I've gone for a using
base_class:set; instead, I still have a little more testing to do
before I check
Hello there
copy constructors for matrix2 now not work (and by this i mean code will not
compile), i believe other matrices that are done with MatrixTemplate have same
behavior
repro code:
#include osg/Uniform
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
osg::Matrix2 m(0,0,0,0);
osg::Matrix2 m1(m);
Replying to myself :)
Problem is: declaration of set(...) methods in derived Matrix*Template classes
hides base class MatrixTemplate::set(...) pack of methods
This can be solved by adding line:
using MatrixTemplate[template params]::set;
in each derived class declaration.
May be someone
Hi Sergey,
On 26/04/12 23:39 , Sergey Polischuk wrote:
Replying to myself :)
Problem is: declaration of set(...) methods in derived Matrix*Template
classes hides base class MatrixTemplate::set(...) pack of methods
This can be solved by adding line:
using MatrixTemplate[template
7 matches
Mail list logo
