Re: [osg-users] Reminder: OSG training in Austin, TX

Hi Paul, How often do you guys do these training sessions? I doubt my company will want to send me this time, but it might be worth sending a few of us in the future if these sessions will continue to be offered. For that matter, how often do you do the OpenGL training? I have a

Re: [osg-users] Build problems with osgviewerFLTK (OSG 2.6.0)

Hey guys, I moved to a new development box with openSUSE 11.0 (x86_64), so I had to rebuild OpenSceneGraph. This time, I decided to use ccmake and edit the configuration to build the documentation and support for some more libraries. I ran into some trouble when it tries to build

[osg-users] Returning ref_ptr vs. ref_ptr::get()

can get a feel for where OSG is coming from. Remember, I'm new to OSG, so talk slowly and don't hurt my feelings ;-) Thanks, Cliff Taylor ___ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users

Re: [osg-users] Returning ref_ptr vs. ref_ptr::get()

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Robert Osfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Cliff, I won't dive in deep in this topic as it's been covered many times and there is docs up on the wiki. W.r.t access to .get(), yes this in theory can lead to misuse, but it's also key to genuine uses - such as

Re: [osg-users] Returning ref_ptr vs. ref_ptr::get()

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Paul Martz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I don't understand is why he doesn't just return grp and let it call the copy ctor. In the example you cited, I could've done as you suggest. But as you and Robert already discussed, this wouldn't work if the return