Re: [osg-users] Mutex and ReentrantMutex

On Nov 30, 2007 10:16 PM, André Garneau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Paul, 1. I always understood reentrant to refer to code or an object that could be executed safely by multiple threads or processes. However, the ReentrantMutex would only be used for code that is safe for the _same_

Re: [osg-users] Mutex and ReentrantMutex

Hi Paul, 1. I always understood reentrant to refer to code or an object that could be executed safely by multiple threads or processes. However, the ReentrantMutex would only be used for code that is safe for the _same_ thread or process to execute concurrently, thus my confusion. Is the name

Re: [osg-users] Mutex and ReentrantMutex

On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 13:45 -0600, Thrall, Bryan wrote: Paul Martz wrote on Friday, November 30, 2007 1:28 PM: 1. I always understood reentrant to refer to code or an object that could be executed safely by multiple threads or processes. However, the ReentrantMutex would only be used for

Re: [osg-users] Mutex and ReentrantMutex

Paul Martz wrote on Friday, November 30, 2007 1:28 PM: 1. I always understood reentrant to refer to code or an object that could be executed safely by multiple threads or processes. However, the ReentrantMutex would only be used for code that is safe for the _same_ thread or process to execute

Re: [osg-users] Mutex and ReentrantMutex

: November-30-07 11:45 AM To: 'OpenSceneGraph Users' Subject: [osg-users] Mutex and ReentrantMutex (Temporary brain cramp, because I know I knew this at one point...) Can someone explain the difference between Mutex and ReentrantMutex? The code comments are practically non-existent, the code itself

[osg-users] Mutex and ReentrantMutex

(Temporary brain cramp, because I know I knew this at one point...) Can someone explain the difference between Mutex and ReentrantMutex? The code comments are practically non-existent, the code itself seems somewhat un-illuminating, and the ChangeLog just says things like Added ReentrantMutex to