Ah ...
It's so obvious! Decades of programming is no guarantee for error free
code.
Thanks!!!
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:39:55 -0500, Jean-Sébastien Guay wrote:
Hello Werner, D.J.,
I would recommend that you either: 1)
use ref_ptr as your return type, or 2) wait to use ref_ptr outside
of
Dear community,
Maybe someone of you can give me a hint.
I'm running Windows 7 64 Bit and osg 2.8.3.
I have a Qt application working with AdapterWidget.
Al my scene works fine and is displayed the right way.
After deleting my view (derived from AdapterWidget) and reinstantiation
of the view
Hello, Werner.
If I read your createObject correctly, you appear to be returning a raw
pointer to an object that gets deleted within the function. Using ref_ptr
in the local scope, but returning a raw pointer, results in the deletion of
the object when you leave the function, since the only live
Hello Werner, D.J.,
I would recommend that you either: 1)
use ref_ptr as your return type, or 2) wait to use ref_ptr outside of
createObject.
Or return obj1.release() instead of obj1.get().
This tells the ref_ptr to decrease its ref count, but not delete the
object if it gets to 0 (contrary
4 matches
Mail list logo
