Re: [osgi-dev] OSGi enRoute Maven Testers wanted ...

I ended up having: → mvn clean install [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building osgi.enroute.examples.eval.bndrun 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO]

Re: [osgi-dev] Promises 1.1 Draft

> On 11 Oct 2016, at 15:18, Simon Chemouil wrote: > > Hey Timothy, > > Thanks for your answer! Final(?) comments inside :-) > > >> It sounds as though you’re making pretty heavy use of Promises, which is >> great to hear! I agree that an external method can be used to

Re: [osgi-dev] A middle ground between hard dependencies and purely dynamic dependencies (DS)

These sides are -completely- disconnected and run by very different webmasters. Kind regards, Peter Kriens > On 11 okt. 2016, at 16:28, Benson Margulies wrote: > > It's no longer dead AFAICT, so I doubt that I can be very precise here. > > When the enRoute

Re: [osgi-dev] A middle ground between hard dependencies and purely dynamic dependencies (DS)

It's no longer dead AFAICT, so I doubt that I can be very precise here. When the enRoute stuff first came up, several more or less front pages of osgi.org stopped displaying what they used to display, and displayed information about enRoute instead. I deleted my bookmarks, swore a bit, and moved

Re: [osgi-dev] OSGi enRoute Maven Testers wanted ...

> Btw. I wonder if we could use a command line option for maven to auto update the runbundles. So you could describe to first run the build with mvn install. It fails and then run again with the option to replace the runbundles. That would be a lot simpler than copy pasting them.  We just added

Re: [osgi-dev] Promises 1.1 Draft

Hi Simon, It sounds as though you’re making pretty heavy use of Promises, which is great to hear! I agree that an external method can be used to provide timeouts, but the fact that users (including me) have felt it necessary to create the method indicates that it should probably be part of the

Re: [osgi-dev] OSGi enRoute Maven Testers wanted ...

I have done the complete tutorial, following all the steps in detail (yep even using vi!). It's a great way to learn some basic things about the enroute/bnd way-of-working, combined with mvn pom setup. Most importantly : everything works as described from the first try. (I did have one

Re: [osgi-dev] Promises 1.1 Draft

Hi Timothy, Thanks for your answer. Comments inlined. [snip] > occur if the provider of the promise is mis-coded, or simply if the > triggering event never occurs. Timing out is usually the right thing to > do in these situations, so adding a primitive for that to the Promise > was made a target

Re: [osgi-dev] Promises 1.1 Draft

Hi Simon, > On 11 Oct 2016, at 10:58, Simon Chemouil wrote: > > Hi, > > I had a look at the recently published Compendium R7 draft. > > I noticed the Promise interface has, among other changes, two new methods: > * public Promise timeout(long milliseconds) > * public

[osgi-dev] Promises 1.1 Draft

Hi, I had a look at the recently published Compendium R7 draft. I noticed the Promise interface has, among other changes, two new methods: * public Promise timeout(long milliseconds) * public Promise delay(long milliseconds) (I somehow suppose these are also used by the new PushStream API) Is