Re: [osgi-dev] Universal purpose of Configuration Admin new functions

On 22.11.2016 21:19, Balázs Zsoldos wrote: The focus is not on webconsole here or on any tools. Webconsole uses the current API and this is true for everything else that creates configuration at the moment. The other thing I wanted to highlight here: It is much more comfortable to create

Re: [osgi-dev] Universal purpose of Configuration Admin new functions

Hi Raymond, thanks for the answers. See my notes below with blue. Regards *Balázs* On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Raymond Auge wrote: > I can only answer to a small subset of your email. > > But perhaps we should have an answer for most of this from Carsten >

Re: [osgi-dev] Universal purpose of Configuration Admin new functions

I can only answer to a small subset of your email. But perhaps we should have an answer for most of this from Carsten Ziegeler who drove most of the changes in the RFC. But please see my comments inline: On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Balázs Zsoldos wrote: > Hi

Re: [osgi-dev] Universal purpose of Configuration Admin new functions

Hi Raymond (and others), I meant chapter 5.1 of RFC-227 . I will try to write down the flow I went through after I read the spec, so you might be able to tell me where I was wrong. When I first saw this

Re: [osgi-dev] Universal purpose of Configuration Admin new functions

Furthermore, it's quite rare (I've never seen it) in my limited experience than an OSGi spec is directly influenced by a particular implementation in a way that "since this impl does it... so should the spec". I assure you _at least_ BJ would lose his mind if we tried to do this. Sincerely, - Ray

Re: [osgi-dev] Universal purpose of Configuration Admin new functions

Would you mind referring to the section you are referring to specifically by number and paragraph number just so we can better orient ourselves? We don't read these every day so we often forget what's there. :) Sincerely, - Ray On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Balázs Zsoldos