Anne
I was asked to evaluate a major campaign costing in excess of AU $100 million
dollars and I was allocated 3 hour opportunities to meet with groups. I did it
my way, Open Space, and the sponsor was very pleased. The results were used to
transform the business with some of the
Dear Ian -
My own learnings, using Open Space with groups of 1,000, 2,000, 3,000 and 3,500
people:
The process is the same. The sense of discovery and (surprisingly) intimacy in
each conversation circle is the same.
Only the space planning is different, but only slightly.
Imagine the huge
Harrison - - 1200+ people. The amount of time needed - and especially how to
harvest the outcomes - is part of what I am asking. I have hosted 200 in OS
with reporting on posters - an hour for 30 sessions, but that is obviously not
an option with 1200.
What I am really asking about is tips on
OST is a very good method for evaluation, especially as one aspect of a
developmental evaluation framework. Times I have used it this way I have been
sure to build it a "meaning making" phase with a small group to make sense of
what was learned. This would be alongside if or in lieu of action
Dear Anne-Béatrice Duparc,
who is interested in this evaluation?
Who is paying you for facilitating the 3-hour event?
How could those (having the passion and the responsibility) find out
whether the open space approach is appropriate for contributing to their
evaluation?
Going through these
Hi everyone,
I was asked to facilitate an annual meeting (3 hours) which purpose is the
evaluation of a series of events taking place every years. The evaluation
concerns the organization of the events and the events itself, in order to know
what went well, what did not and have some hints for
Dear friends,
I am in talks about hosting an OS for 1200+ pax. I have read Sharon Berlin
Chao's report on 1000 under 4 hours. I was wondering if anyone else has tips or
caveats to share? I am grateful for any help I can get! :-)
Warm regards,
Ian Andersen
Brussels
Sent from my iPad
