All,
please add your arguments to this OsmAnd github issue thread:
https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand/issues/6118
Please give examples (especially when they are not mentioned yet) and use a
thorough argumentation.
Thanks.
Harry
Op wo 3 okt. 2018 om 15:14 schreef Massimo Mula :
> >> A better
>> A better way around that would be some way to tell Osmand what kind of
thing we're looking for (street, city, store, lake, river, ...)
Yes, this is exactly what I intended!
No need to show up streets, squares and PDI when user is looking for a
city/town.
BTW, if you do a POI search, it is
> But if the destination is very far and I don't know where it is/I'm in
> hurry/I'm too lazy to scroll the map around :), what happens you can see in
> the attached picture: it shows all matches found in a range of about 15 Km
> from current position, while Rome (city) is located as far as about
Max1234Ita writes:
> The example I always make is: "In Italy, try displaying Rome city by just
> typing "Roma" in the search box."
> In that case, "Rome - city" is correctly found... among something like
> 15000 other matches (in Italy it is very easy to find something which has
> "Roma" in its
I agree too.
Actually, the new search would not be that bad... if only it allowed some
kind of sorting of the found matches.
The example I always make is: "In Italy, try displaying Rome city by just
typing "Roma" in the search box."
In that case, "Rome - city" is correctly found... among
So do I.
In some cases the full text search did not even given an address and then
you could only use the classic search.
Harry
Op di 2 okt. 2018 om 14:50 schreef Max :
>
> Legacy search was better, there is no need for removing it.
>>
>
> I fully agree.
>
> --
> You received this message
> Legacy search was better, there is no need for removing it.
>
I fully agree.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Yes I know, but I hope for a lot of loud disagreement on every possible forum.
Legacy search was better, there is no need for removing it.
The solution to use with an option in OsmAnd development was quite good.
Peter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Already answered here:
https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand/issues/6118
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:33 AM Peter B wrote:
> is this intended ?
Unfortunately yes :-(
https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand/commit/0ae307dbf67cc379eff7d01d012d7052880d9566
I also liked this feature.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Osmand" group.
is this intended ?
There is no more item in menu and no more option in OsmAnd development.
Why did you remove it, until now it is much better than "new" search !
Peter
Version (WITHOUT legacy search) 3.2.0.#25997. 2018-10-01
Version (~last With legacy search) 3.2.0.#25959. 2018-09-24
--
You
11 matches
Mail list logo
