Re: Osmand claims it uses elevation data - but it doesn't

2019-05-25 Thread Bart Eisenberg
Ah, right. And agreed. The time calculation on OsmAnd does not take elevation gain or loss into account. On Saturday, May 25, 2019 at 2:56:34 PM UTC-7, jot ess wrote: > > Obviously I have not made my problem clear. I have not systematically > tried whether routing is different with

Re: My Places - how to sort them

2019-05-25 Thread Bart Eisenberg
Viewing them in My places >Favorites, I don't think there's a way to view them by distance. But if you press the Directions button (the one with the arrow) and then either My Position or Select Destination > Favorites, that option is available in the upper right. On Saturday, May 25, 2019

Re: Osmand claims it uses elevation data - but it doesn't

2019-05-25 Thread jot ess
Obviously I have not made my problem clear. I have not systematically tried whether routing is different with different options. My point is, that elevation is not taken into account for calculation of time. I tried different options for a hill nearby (where there are no different

My Places - how to sort them

2019-05-25 Thread Helmut Jarausch
Hi, I have more than a hundred favourites, lots of them being several hundred kilometers apart. Is there a means to sort the list according to the distance to the current position. Many thanks for a hint, Helmut -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Osmand claims it uses elevation data - but it doesn't

2019-05-25 Thread Bart Eisenberg
I tried this on possible bicycle ride around here. With elevation data off, it routed over a ridge using fire roads. With the option on, it took a much flatter, but longer, route via surface streets. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group.

Re: Osmand claims it uses elevation data - but it doesn't

2019-05-25 Thread Bart Eisenberg
This is just anecdotal and someone with an understanding of the algorithm would have a better answer, but using elevation data, I've made this work for a couple of hiking routes where the two routes are close to each other and (of course) wind up in the same place. One of them is in Yosemite,

Re: waypoints in osmand+

2019-05-25 Thread Eriberto Mombelli
ok thanks a lot!!! Eriberto Mombelli Il Sab 25 Mag 2019, 13:25 Alfred Meyer ha scritto: > Hi, > I load your file and it's all fine. > > If you tab on the GPX file on your phone, the phone ask you, with which > app you will open the file, choose osmand. > Then Osmand will ask you, if you want

Re: waypoints in osmand+

2019-05-25 Thread Alfred Meyer
Hi, I load your file and it's all fine. If you tab on the GPX file on your phone, the phone ask you, with which app you will open the file, choose osmand. Then Osmand will ask you, if you want to load the file as favorite or gpx file. Choose favorites to get the waypoints, Do this once more

Osmand claims it uses elevation data - but it doesn't

2019-05-25 Thread jot ess
Hi all, I have been reading a bit in this forum and my impression is that I am not alone with my question and there has not been a clear answer yet: Osmand+ claims it uses elevation data - but obviously it doesn't. Or only under certain circumstances. When I use Osmand+ for bicycle routing

Selection on map does not work properly

2019-05-25 Thread Mike
I have made an example video. What you see is using OSMAND+ with gloves and a resistive screen. https://youtu.be/dApftmTBSS0 As you can see it works perfectly when using buttons. Or at least good enough. But when you want to select a point on the map, it usually "decides" that you were