tf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-...@ietf.org>"
mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-...@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] AD review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06
Hi Bruno,
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 7:59 AM,
mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> wrote:
H
AD review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06
>
>
>
> Hi Alia,
>
>
>
> *From: *OSPF on behalf of Alia Atlas <
> akat...@gmail.com>
>
> *Date: *Friday, August 11, 2017 at 10:42 PM
> *To: *"draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-...@ietf.org" encapsulat
Hi Alia, Acee, WG
From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2017 7:25 PM
To: Alia Atlas; draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-...@ietf.org; OSPF List
Subject: Re: [OSPF] AD review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06
Hi Alia,
From: OSPF mailto:ospf-boun...@ietf.org
f-encapsulation-...@ietf.org>>,
OSPF WG List mailto:ospf@ietf.org>>
Subject: [OSPF] AD review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06
As is customary, I have done another AD review of
draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06. First, I'd like to thank the authors for
their work an
As is customary, I have done another AD review
of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06. First, I'd like to thank the
authors for their work and the improvement.
I have one minor issue on the IANA section.
For the current FCFS space, I think it would be better to have
"Specification Required" so
