[ovs-dev] [PATCH V2 1/2] ofproto-dpif-xlate: Change priority tags from boolean to enum

2019-05-11 Thread Eli Britstein
Priority tags is a port configuration to determine how the port treats priority tags, e.g. zero VLAN ID. Change the type from boolean to enum as a pre-step towards introducing additional modes. The new options are "omit", equivalent to previously "false", and "include-non-zero", equivalent to

[ovs-dev] [PATCH V2 2/2] ofproto-dpif-xlate: Add include mode to priority tags

2019-05-11 Thread Eli Britstein
Configure "include-non-zero" priority tags to retain the 802.1Q header when the VLAN ID is zero, except both the VLAN ID and priority are zero. Add a "include" configuration option to retain the 802.1Q header in such frames as well. Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan --- NEWS

[ovs-dev] [PATCH V2 0/2] Add include mode to priority tags port option

2019-05-11 Thread Eli Britstein
Setting priority-tags to "true" Open vSwitch still omits the 802.1Q header on output if both the VLAN ID and priority would be zero. Add an option to retain the 8021Q header in such frames as well. Patch #1: change boolean to enum as a pre-step to adding addition option Patch #2: add "include"

[ovs-dev] Joint Venture !!!!!!

2019-05-11 Thread Mr. Vladimir Oleg
Dear sir, I represent a high net-worth investor who is seeking the attention of investors, project owners and general business facilitators away from his native country. Can you help achieve this? kindly respond back for further details. Regards Mr. Vladimir Oleg

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] OVN: Fix the ovn-controller 100% usage issue with put_mac_bindings

2019-05-11 Thread Numan Siddique
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 2:09 PM Numan Siddique wrote: > > > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 5:38 AM Ankur Sharma > wrote: > >> Hi Han, >> >> Thanks for review. >> >> Yup, looks like it, although I did not try the scenario myself, but yes >> entry are not getting removed once added, >> hence, new mac

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] OVN: Fix the ovn-controller 100% usage issue with put_mac_bindings

2019-05-11 Thread Numan Siddique
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 5:38 AM Ankur Sharma wrote: > Hi Han, > > Thanks for review. > > Yup, looks like it, although I did not try the scenario myself, but yes > entry are not getting removed once added, > hence, new mac bindings will not be added after some time (as existing > count reaches