On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:57:33 +0200 Paul Blakey wrote:
> @@ -238,10 +239,12 @@ void
> skb_flow_dissect_ct(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct flow_dissector *flow_dissector,
> void *target_container, u16 *ctinfo_map,
> - size_t mapsize, bool
Few problems with a current documentation:
1. bridge.rst is the high-level documentation for the end user.
Unit testing and complex implementation details are for developers,
hence should not be there. Testing instructions for developers
should be in testing.rst. Words in the doc
On 22 Nov 2021, at 12:22, Adrian Moreno wrote:
> Most of ofproto and dpif flows are based on key-value pairs. These
> key-value pairs can be represented in several ways, eg: key:value,
> key=value, key(value).
>
> Add the following classes that allow parsing of key-value strings:
> * KeyValue:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 10:16 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 12/9/21 14:54, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > When performing CT_LB action in ovn-trace, take into account current
> > connection tracking state provided by the user.
> >
> > Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980702
On 2 Dec 2021, at 11:05, Kumar Amber wrote:
> Modified the dplcs info-get command output to include
> the count for different dpcls implementations.
>
> $ovs-appctl dpif-netdev/subtable-lookup-prio-get
>
> Available dpcls implementations:
> autovalidator (Use count: 1, Priority: 5)
>
Thanks Dumitru.
Regards,
Vladislav Odintsov
> On 10 Dec 2021, at 14:13, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 12/9/21 17:12, Vladislav Odintsov wrote:
>> Hi Dumitru,
>>
>
> Hi Vladislav,
>
>> thanks for review & testing and pointing for the broken behaviour.
>> I’ve missed such case, and I think this
On 12/9/21 17:12, Vladislav Odintsov wrote:
> Hi Dumitru,
>
Hi Vladislav,
> thanks for review & testing and pointing for the broken behaviour.
> I’ve missed such case, and I think this usecase should be of course
> supported. Maybe, it should be listed in a ovn testcases for not loose it one
