On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:34 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 6:18 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> >
> > There were problems observed occasionally after OVS restart, the
> > OVS flow bundle installation from ovn-controller was failed because of
> > "GROUP_EXISTS" error, which end up
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 6:18 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> There were problems observed occasionally after OVS restart, the
> OVS flow bundle installation from ovn-controller was failed because of
> "GROUP_EXISTS" error, which end up with missing flows/groups/meters
> in OVS until ovn-controller is
$NC_EOF_OPT should be used to avoid some netcat implementations
to wait indefinitely.
This fixes the check-offloads testsuite hanging in Ubuntu 22.04.
Fixes: 5660b89a309d ("dpif-netlink: Offloading meter to tc police action")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
---
tests/system-offloads-traffic.at |
Currently queue_userspace_packet will call kfree_skb for all frames,
whether or not an error occurred. This can result in a single dropped
frame being reported as multiple drops in dropwatch. This patch will
consume the skbs instead.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109957
Frames sent to userspace can be reported as dropped in
ovs_dp_process_packet, however, if they are dropped in the netlink code
then netlink_attachskb will report the same frame as dropped.
This patch checks for error codes which indicate that the frame has
already been freed.
Bugzilla:
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior in
lib/dpif-netlink.c:1077:40: runtime error:
left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'
#0 0x73fc31 in dpif_netlink_port_add_compat lib/dpif-netlink.c:1077:40
#1 0x73fc31 in dpif_netlink_port_add
LeakSanitizer for some reason reports these json objects as leaked,
even though we do have references to them at the moment ovs_fatal()
called from check_ovsdb_error().
Previously it complained only with -O2, but with newer versions of
clang/llvm it started complaining even with -O1. For
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 5:00 PM Frode Nordahl
wrote:
> > > This is only a suggestion to avoid adding too many -Wl options as they
> > > stack up if you are not careful.
> >
> > I see. Though, it is probably not a big concern for this particular
> > use-case.
> >
> > I can replace '-Wl,-Bstatic
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:17 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 7/27/22 23:02, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 2:29 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >>
> >> Current version of debian/rules simply passes the libopenvswitch.a
> >> as a command line argument via LDFLAGS, but that doesn't
Oops, sorry about that. This should be backported to 22.06.
Acked-By: Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> After commit 'd07e5f99d ("Introduce match_outport_dp_and_port_keys
> in physical.c")' it is not longer possible to ping a parent port from
> container one.
>
> Reported-at:
After commit 'd07e5f99d ("Introduce match_outport_dp_and_port_keys
in physical.c")' it is not longer possible to ping a parent port from
container one.
Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105901
Fixes: d07e5f99d ("Introduce match_outport_dp_and_port_keys in physical.c")
On 7/27/22 23:02, David Marchand wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 2:29 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>
>> Current version of debian/rules simply passes the libopenvswitch.a
>> as a command line argument via LDFLAGS, but that doesn't actually
>> lead to this library being statically linked into python
On 28 Jul 2022, at 13:57, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> On 27 Jul 2022, at 16:48, Kevin Sprague wrote:
>
>> During normal operations, it is useful to understand when a particular flow
>> gets removed from the system. This can be useful when debugging performance
>> issues tied to ofproto flow
On 27 Jul 2022, at 16:48, Kevin Sprague wrote:
> During normal operations, it is useful to understand when a particular flow
> gets removed from the system. This can be useful when debugging performance
> issues tied to ofproto flow changes, trying to determine deployed traffic
> patterns, or
When the packet was traveling through patch port boundary
OvS would check if any of the actions is reversible,
if not it would clone the packet. However, the check
was only at the first level of the second bridge.
That caused some issues when the packet had gone
through more actions, some of them
Hello, Ihar,
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:28 AM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka
> ---
> controller/test-vif-plug.c | 2 +-
> tests/ovn-vif-plug.at | 2 +-
> tests/testsuite.at | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
16 matches
Mail list logo
