Hi Ben,
Few comments inline.
Thanks
Numan
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:53 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> Thanks Ben for providing the review comments.
>
> I will address all the comments.
>
> A couple of comments inline.
>
> Thanks
> Numan
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:33 AM Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:53:53PM +0530, Numan Siddique wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:33 AM Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > The OpenFlow syntax looks really weird. I don't understand it at all.
> >
>
> By OpenFlow syntax you mean the way this action is being used ?
>
> i.e
Thanks Ben for providing the review comments.
I will address all the comments.
A couple of comments inline.
Thanks
Numan
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:33 AM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:30:33PM +0530, nusid...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
> > This patch adds
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:30:33PM +0530, nusid...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> This patch adds a new action 'check_pkt_larger' which checks if the
> packet is larger than the given size and stores the result in the
> destination register.
Thanks.
This patch renumbers
From: Numan Siddique
This patch adds a new action 'check_pkt_larger' which checks if the
packet is larger than the given size and stores the result in the
destination register.
Usage: check_pkt_larger:len->REGISTER
Eg. match=...,actions=check_pkt_larger:1442->NXM_NX_REG0[0],next;
This patch
