Hi Nick,
Sorry for dropping late to the party .
I have no idea what the root cause is, but maybe this will help with your
debugging:
http://64.119.130.115/ovs/3d8e7354f5e981dee3301268fc498efcec6521e9/testsuite.dir/2180/testsuite.log.gz
The issue is p5 changes from disabled to listening and
A python script to decode ofproto/trace output to add ovn lflow
information inline.
Signed-off-by: Han Zhou
---
manpages.mk| 4 ++
ovn/utilities/automake.mk | 15 +--
ovn/utilities/ovn-detrace.1.in | 29 +
ovn/utilities/ovn-detrace.in
Aaron Conole writes:
> The Open vSwitch run, log, and DB directories are installed as part of the
> normal `make install` process. However, this means they are created with
> user and group ownership that may conflict with the desired user. For
> example, running `make
> -Original Message-
> From: Jianbo Liu [mailto:jianbo@arm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 10:55 AM
> To: Hemant Agrawal
> Cc: b...@ovn.org; d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] netdev-dpdk: fix ARM cross compilation
> failure
>
>
Add support for handling OVS_CT_ATTR_FORCE_COMMIT in Conntrack action.
When this flag is specified, it implicitly means commit and deletes
entries in the reverse direction.
Signed-off-by: Sairam Venugopal
---
datapath-windows/ovsext/Conntrack.c | 20 ++--
1
The 03/21/2017 06:43, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jianbo Liu [mailto:jianbo@arm.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 10:55 AM
> > To: Hemant Agrawal
> > Cc: b...@ovn.org; d...@openvswitch.org
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH
On 20/03/2017 23:08, Joe Stringer wrote:
If a handler thread takes a long time to set up a set of flows, it is
possible for one of the installed flows to be dumped and scheduled
for deletion by a revalidator thread before the handler is able to
transition the ukey into an operational
On 21/03/2017 10:04, Paul Blakey wrote:
On 20/03/2017 23:08, Joe Stringer wrote:
If a handler thread takes a long time to set up a set of flows, it is
possible for one of the installed flows to be dumped and scheduled
for deletion by a revalidator thread before the handler is able to
On 03/20/2017 11:19 AM, O Mahony, Billy wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 6:35 PM
>> To: O Mahony, Billy ; d...@openvswitch.org
>> Cc: Loftus, Ciara
On 21/03/2017 09:54, Paul Blakey wrote:
On 20/03/2017 23:08, Joe Stringer wrote:
On 19 March 2017 at 07:28, Paul Blakey wrote:
Hi all,
While using out patches for HW offload we've noticed we get a ovs
assertion
at transition ukey, which tries to
transition the ukey
The difference between machines may cause the test to fail.
This patch has been tested on centos 7.2 (kernel 3.10.0,
python 2.7.5 and gcc 4.8.5) and ubuntu 16.04 (kernel 4.4.0,
python 3.5.2 and 5.4.0). This patch may make the stp test
more stable.
Fixes: 427e9751f300 ("tests: Add and improve stp
Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole
---
lib/dpctl.man | 35 +++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/dpctl.man b/lib/dpctl.man
index 2fcbc94..c5fdaa7 100644
--- a/lib/dpctl.man
+++ b/lib/dpctl.man
@@ -136,7 +136,42 @@ With
On 17 March 2017 at 15:30, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
> This patch extends gratuitous ARP support for NAT addresses so that it
> applies to centralized NAT rules on a distributed router, in addition to
> the existing gratuitous ARP support for NAT addresses on gateway routers.
On 03/21/2017 04:08 AM, Jianbo Liu wrote:
> The 03/20/2017 17:29, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
>> DPDK 16.07 introduced the support for mempool offload support.
>> rte_pktmbuf_pool_create is the recommended method for creating pktmbuf
>> pools. Buffer pools created with rte_mempool_create may not get
On 03/20/2017 11:38 AM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> DPDK 16.07 introduced the support for mempool offload support.
> rte_pktmbuf_pool_create is the recommended method for creating pktmbuf
> pools. Buffer pools created with rte_mempool_create may not get offloaded
> to the underlying offloaded
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Guru Shetty wrote:
>
>
> On 17 March 2017 at 15:30, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
>
>> This patch extends gratuitous ARP support for NAT addresses so that it
>> applies to centralized NAT rules on a distributed router, in addition to
This test clearly demonstrates the bit order of labels in the OpenFlow
wire format.
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
---
tests/ofp-actions.at | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/ofp-actions.at b/tests/ofp-actions.at
index 6f9f5c1..11b3653 100644
---
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Dong Jun wrote:
> All networking-ovn patches' CI failed for
> gate-tempest-dsvm-networking-ovn-ovs-master,
> VM can not acquire a DHCP IP. The CI of branch-2.7 is OK.
>
> I have found some error info, I did not replicate it in my local
When bridges destroyed, which stp enabled, you can
still get stp info via the command 'ovs-appctl stp/show'.
And the rstp is also in the same case. We should unref
them. The rstp/stp ports have been unregistered via
'ofproto_port_unregister' function when ports destroyed.
We will unref rstp/stp
On 20/03/2017 23:08, Joe Stringer wrote:
If a handler thread takes a long time to set up a set of flows, it is
possible for one of the installed flows to be dumped and scheduled
for deletion by a revalidator thread before the handler is able to
transition the ukey into an operational
Acked-by: Alin Gabriel Serdean
> -Original Message-
> From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-dev-
> boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Sairam Venugopal
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 9:02 AM
> To: d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: [ovs-dev]
Due to the recent ongoing infrastructural development in our
company,
we are currently recruiting/employing highly motivated
construction
professionals to join our workforce in Preconstruction in U.S.A.
POSITIONS AVAILABLE:
Managers, QA/QC Engineers,HSE Engineers, Pipeline Engineers,
22 matches
Mail list logo