On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 04:57:42PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
> > On May 26, 2017, at 10:55 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > This function tried to check 'iface_peer' for null, but it actually
> > checked its always-nonnull 'peer' argument instead. This fixes the
> > problem.
> >
There are two computer node, each have one vm. And the two vms in
indifferent vlan networks. The ping between the vms is not success.
The reason is that, acl of to-localnet port or from-localnet port is
signed to contrack. So the pair of icmp request and reply have different
zone id in one ovs
> On May 26, 2017, at 9:14 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> This fixes a seemingly severe memory leak in ipfix_send_template_msgs().
> This function was setting up a buffer with a stub, but only the first 4
> or 8 bytes of the stub were actually used because the "sizeof" call used
> to
> On May 26, 2017, at 9:52 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> In C, it is undefined to shift an N-bit value by N. This fixes the
> problem in find_batch() for the case where i == 0.
>
> Found by Coverity.
>
> Reported-at:
>
> On May 26, 2017, at 8:59 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> Code generated by this program includes constructs like this:
>
>switch (((uint64_t) vendor << 32) | (type << 16) | code)
>
> with variables uint32_t vendor, uint16_t type, uint16_t code. By C rules,
> "type << 16" has
> On May 26, 2017, at 8:39 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> The code in ofputil_decode_port_mod() was originally meant to mask
> the returned 'config' value against 'mask'. That is, only bits that are
> marked in 'mask' as to be modified can be set to 1-bits in the returned
> 'config'
> On May 26, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> Found by Coverity.
>
> Reported-at:
> https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v16889/p10449/fileInstanceId=14762682=4304823=180423
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
Acked-by: Justin Pettit
--Justin
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:10:02AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 07:36 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> > ---
> > utilities/checkpatch.py | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/utilities/checkpatch.py
Click here for our latest pricelist for June
Click here for all offers...
If you no longer
wish to receive mail from us, you can
unsubscribe
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:13:48AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 14:38 +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> > When trying to configure a system port as type=internal it could start
> > an infinite port creation loop. When this happens you will see the
> > following log messages:
> >
>
On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 14:38 +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> When trying to configure a system port as type=internal it could start
> an infinite port creation loop. When this happens you will see the
> following log messages:
>
> 2017-06-01T09:00:17.900Z|02813|dpif|WARN|system@ovs-system: failed
Test case to match outer, pop outer, then match inner VLAN.
Signed-off-by: Eric Garver
---
tests/system-traffic.at | 35 +++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/system-traffic.at b/tests/system-traffic.at
index
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:28 AM, 钢锁0918 wrote:
> that is for this problem[ovs-dev] [ovs-discuss] ovn: unsnat handling error
> for Distributed Gatewayhttps://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-
> dev/2017-April/330536.html
I don't understand why this workaround is a good
IMO, following that discuss mail chain, it ends up here:
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2017-April/331200.html
I did not see any update to the test case to reproduce the problem.
On 1 June 2017 at 04:28, 钢锁0918 wrote:
> that is for this problem[ovs-dev]
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:07:38PM +0800, ychen wrote:
> I can reproduce this problem with the script supported by vguntaka in both
> ovs version 2.5 and ovs version 2.6.
>
> 1. Add bridge
>
> ovs-vsctl add-br br0
>
>
>
> 2. Add vm port
>
> ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap0 – set
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 04:00:10PM +0200, Gabor Szucs wrote:
>
> hereby I'm sending an implementation of configurable BFD Detect Multiplier.
Hi, thanks for the patch.
This doesn't apply; in fact, every single hunk is a reject against
master.
Maybe you should submit it as a pull request via
On 30/05/2017 11:07, Simon Horman wrote:
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 02:59:44PM +0300, Roi Dayan wrote:
Add tc module to expose tc operations to be used by other modules.
Move some tc related functions from netdev-linux.c to tc.c
This patch doesn't change any functionality.
Signed-off-by: Paul
ovs_checkpatch_parse() takes 2 arguments, not sys.exit(). Oops.
Fixes: 95bd35d3db19 ("checkpatch: Implement -f option more usefully.")
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
utilities/checkpatch.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/utilities/checkpatch.py
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
utilities/checkpatch.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/utilities/checkpatch.py b/utilities/checkpatch.py
index 1c83b2965cbd..3ebd53ad06b7 100755
--- a/utilities/checkpatch.py
+++ b/utilities/checkpatch.py
@@ -200,7
>From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org]
>On Behalf Of
>Ilya Maximets
>Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 3:12 PM
>To: d...@openvswitch.org; Darrell Ball
>Cc: Heetae Ahn ; Ilya Maximets
>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 09:08:45AM +0200, Matthias May wrote:
> On 31/05/17 18:29, Greg Rose wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 08:32 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:39:28AM +0200, Matthias May wrote:
> >>> On 27/05/17 04:29, Hunt Xu wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 04:55:41AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 16:08 -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 14:32 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:13:31PM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> > > >
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > They both seem to be
Hi,
hereby I'm sending an implementation of configurable BFD Detect Multiplier.
Mult value (bfd.DetectMult in RFC5880) is hard-coded and equal to 3 in
current openvswitch. As a consequence remote and local mult is the same.
In this commit the mult (Detect Multiplier/bfd.DetectMult/Detect Mult)
When trying to configure a system port as type=internal it could start
an infinite port creation loop. When this happens you will see the
following log messages:
2017-06-01T09:00:17.900Z|02813|dpif|WARN|system@ovs-system: failed to add
ve01_1 as port: File exists
>From: Darrell Ball [mailto:db...@vmware.com]
>Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 1:14 AM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; Chandran, Sugesh
>; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org; qiud...@chinac.com
>Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] netdev-dpdk: multi-segment
On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 16:08 -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 14:32 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:13:31PM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> > >
>
> [snip]
>
> > > They both seem to be broken SFAICT.
> > >
> > > I'll work on fixing them up.
> >
> > Thank you!
>
that is for this problem[ovs-dev] [ovs-discuss] ovn: unsnat handling error for
Distributed
Gatewayhttps://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2017-April/330536.html
*RTFSC*
--发件人:Ben Pfaff
Dia bom,
Nós NORTON FINANCE COMPANY baseados no Reino Unido pelas operações e boa base
de clientes em todo o mundo. Nós fornecemos vários tipos de empréstimos
(empréstimos de curto e longo prazo, empréstimos pessoais, empréstimos a
empresas, etc.) por taxa de juros de 3%. Emitemos
Dia bom,
Nós NORTON FINANCE COMPANY baseados no Reino Unido pelas operações e boa base
de clientes em todo o mundo. Nós fornecemos vários tipos de empréstimos
(empréstimos de curto e longo prazo, empréstimos pessoais, empréstimos a
empresas, etc.) por taxa de juros de 3%. Emitemos
On 06/01/2017 08:57 AM, Weglicki, MichalX wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank all for your comments, my answers inline.
>
> Br,
> Michal.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Darrell Ball [mailto:db...@vmware.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 4:41 AM
>> To: Kavanagh, Mark B
30 matches
Mail list logo