Hi,
I have used first link to install, compile and run OVS 2.9.0 and DPDK
18.02, second link to configure vhost-client ports. However, facing several
issues when configured as per the documentation. Inputs appreciated.
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/intro/install/dpdk/
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 05:09:46PM -0700, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a use-case and I want to
> >
> > (1) create vhost-user ports on OVS-DPDK running on a host
> > (2) in a container a d
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 9:50 AM Ian Stokes wrote:
> On 6/12/2018 9:50 PM, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:31 AM, Stokes, Ian > <mailto:ian.sto...@intel.com>> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> >
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:31 AM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have used first link to install, compile and run OVS 2.9.0 and DPDK
> > 18.02, second link to configure vhost-client ports. However, facing
> > several issues when configured as per the documentation. Inputs
> > appreciated.
>
Hi,
I have a use-case and I want to
(1) create vhost-user ports on OVS-DPDK running on a host
(2) in a container a dpdk-based application using virtio-user connecting to
vhost-user ports via sockets.
I looked at following 2 links from Intel which shows how-to configure
vhost-user and
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:27 AM Ilya Maximets
wrote:
> Hi,
> According to your log, your NIC has limited size of tx queues:
>
> 2018-06-19T04:34:46.106Z|00089|dpdk|ERR|PMD: Unsupported size of TX queue
>(max size: 1024)
>
> This means that
Hi,
I am using above configuration on my testbed and when I try to add a port
which is bound to igb_uio, I see following errors due to Tx queue
configuration. I just want to use single Tx and Rx queue for my testing. I
looked at Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst, i see only "DPDK Physical
Port
Hi,
During scale flow add/delete (>10K), I am seeing ovs-vswitchd cpu usage
spike to 100% and stay there without any sign of returning to normal cpu
usage. It's normal OVS 2.4.1 and no DPDK involved. I am trying to get
'perf' working which might help in isolating the problem. In the meantime I
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:07 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 01:44:33PM -0700, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > During scale flow add/delete (>10K), I am seeing ovs-vswitchd cpu usage
> > spike to 100% and stay there without any sign of returning to normal cpu
> > usag
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:32 AM Ian Stokes wrote:
> On 7/11/2018 7:23 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > On 7/11/2018 7:02 PM, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> >> Hello OVS-DPDK team,
> >>
> >> I am using OVS 2.9.90 for my vhost-virtio testing and had some
> >> questions
11, 2018 at 11:35 AM Ravi Kerur wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:32 AM Ian Stokes wrote:
>
>> On 7/11/2018 7:23 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
>> > On 7/11/2018 7:02 PM, Ravi Kerur wrote:
>> >> Hello OVS-DPDK team,
>> >>
>> >>
Hi,
I am going through following link and setting up the testbed
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/userspace-tunneling/
and it is very confusing to me at least. Can someone please clarify
following questions?
(1) I believe flows needs to be programmed on br-int bridge with
believe
> your assumption is right.
> (4) I don’t try this command, I think more log information in
> /var/log/openvswitch may be helpful. Hope someone have this answer.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel Benli Ye
>
> > On Oct 14, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> >
&g
/howto/userspace-tunneling/
doesn't mention which version of OVS was tested, looks like it is part of
2.10.90? Should I download latest code for this?
Thanks
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 7:51 AM Ravi Kerur wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> Thank you for your quick response and explanation on br-phy to
at 11:22 PM benli ye wrote:
> It seems your ovs version is 2.10.0. I thought it should have this feature
> ready. Add Justin to see if he can confirm on this.
> Is there any core files in your /var/core or /var/log/core?
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>
> On Oct 18, 2018, at
dp port 8472 unreachable, length
86(tos 0x0, ttl 10, id 339, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17),
length 78)*
Thanks.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:00 AM Ravi Kerur wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> When I tried to configure vxlan routes I had mentioned I was seeing
> errors, when I checked
Hello OVS/DPDK team,
I am using OVS+DPDK for some of my work and using 2.12.90 and 18.11.2
versions respectively. I ran some performance tests (iperf3 for TCP and
UDP) on a c5 4xlarge AWS instance. I am supposed to get 10Gbps, however,
for TCP streams I get 2.4Gbps and UDP < 1Gbps.
Ethernet
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:47 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 04:15:06PM -0700, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:06 AM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:03:06AM -0700, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > > > I am going t
Hi,
I am going through OVS 2.11.90 document to build Debian package on Ubuntu
16.04.4.
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/intro/install/distributions/
where it claims to have OVS+DPDK debian package. Snippets below
/**
3. For DPDK datapath, Open vSwitch with DPDK
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:06 AM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:03:06AM -0700, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > I am going through OVS 2.11.90 document to build Debian package on Ubuntu
> > 16.04.4.
> >
> > http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/intro/install/d
Hi,
I am sending this email to gauge if OVS team or community using OVS would
be interested in this effort. I read some discussions which had happened
couple of years back with OVS and Qosmos integration and at least it looked
like OVS team didn't approve of it. I just want to restart it but with
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:36 AM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 09:33:47AM -0700, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:47 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 04:15:06PM -0700, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 1
Hi,
I was using OvS 2.12.90 and DPDK 18.11 and everything was working fine. I
upgraded to OvS 2.13.90 and DPDK 19.11 and DPDK initialization failed for
interfaces. Kindly let me know if I need to make any changes to the
configuration?
DPDK device initialization failed with
David/Flavio, I will try the patch and let you know. Thanks for the quick
help.
Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 12:35 PM Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 08:41:37PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:07 PM Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > > *2020-0
Thanks David and Flavio. Patch worked like a charm.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:05 PM Ravi Kerur wrote:
> David/Flavio, I will try the patch and let you know. Thanks for the quick
> help.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 12:35 PM Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
>> On Tue,
Hi OvS DPDK team,
I am looking at ixgbe_set_rx_function and ixgbe_set_tx_function and would
like to enable vectorized packet handling. Looking at ixgbe_set_rx_function
I see that it depends on device configuration and other parameters like
descriptors, burst sze to enable vectorized Rx and Tx.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 5:05 AM Tonghao Zhang
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 7:57 AM Ravi Kerur wrote:
> >
> > Hello OvS DPDK team,
> >
> > I am using OvS 2.13.90 and DPDK 19.11 and wanted to use HPET timer
> instead
> > of invariant TSC.
> >
> &
Hello OvS-DPDK team,
We are expanding our usage of OvS-DPDK and want to use VF port representors
for one use-case. Going through the following document it is unclear how
this functionality can be achieved
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/topics/dpdk/phy/
I believe following things need to
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 9:57 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 4/16/20 11:00 PM, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > Hello OvS-DPDK team,
> >
> > We are expanding our usage of OvS-DPDK and want to use VF port
> representors
> > for one use-case. Going through the follow
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 1:44 PM William Tu wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 10:20 AM Ravi Kerur wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 8:45 PM William Tu wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:25 PM Ravi Kerur wrote:
> >> >
Hi William,
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:06 AM William Tu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 02:14:26PM -0700, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > Hi OvS DPDK team,
> >
> > I am looking at ixgbe_set_rx_function and ixgbe_set_tx_function and would
> > like to enable vectoriz
Hello OvS DPDK team,
I am using OvS 2.13.90 and DPDK 19.11 and wanted to use HPET timer instead
of invariant TSC.
Enabled CONFIG_RTE_LIBEAL_USE_HPET=y in DPDK
Kernel has
CONFIG_HPET_TIMER=y
CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC=y
CONFIG_HPET=y
CONFIG_HPET_MMAP=y
CONFIG_HPET_MMAP_DEFAULT=y
cat
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 8:45 PM William Tu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:25 PM Ravi Kerur wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am sending this email to gauge if OVS team or community using OVS would
> > be interested in this effort. I read some discussions which
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:37 AM Ravi Kerur wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 3:14 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
>> On 4/19/20 6:08 PM, Ravi Kerur wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 6:14 AM Ilya Maximets > <mailto:i.maxim...@ovn.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 6:14 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 4/18/20 2:33 PM, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 9:57 AM Ilya Maximets <mailto:i.maxim...@ovn.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/16/20 11:00 PM, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> >
whether this has been
tested correctly. We need this feature and I can volunteer to test it if
needed so kindly let me know what the next steps should be if you agree or
please suggest how to proceed.
Thanks,
Ravi
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:04 PM Ravi Kerur wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2
Hello OvS-DPDK team,
Is there a way to change interface mac address for DPDK interfaces?
Interfaces are part of LACP bond.
I tried following commands and they don't seem to work.
ovs-vsctl set interface
other-config:hwaddr=\"00:11:11:11:11:01\"
ovs-vsctl set interface
0
state: 0
current:10GB-FD AUTO_NEG
speed: 1 Mbps now, 0 Mbps max
LOCAL(br-phy): addr:f8:f2:1e:24:04:94
config: 0
state: 0
current:10MB-FD COPPER
speed: 10 Mbps now, 0 Mbps max
Thanks.
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:55 AM R
t;
> >-----Original Message-
> >From: dev On Behalf Of Ravi Kerur
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 9:56 PM
> >To: ovs-dev
> >Subject: [ovs-dev] OvS-DPDK change interface MAC
> >
> >Hello OvS-DPDK team,
> >
> >Is there a way to change inter
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:58 AM Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:19:06AM -0700, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > To answer your question why I need to change mac address, we recently
> moved
> > from kernel/bond to ovs-dpdk/bond with 2 members. With kernel/bond, al
Hello OvS team,
I am looking into vtep functionality and trying to map it to OvS DPDK as
most of our usage is with OvS-DPDK.
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/vtep/
Some clarifications...
In section simulating NVC
$vtep-ctl bind-ls br0 p0 0 ls0
<--- What is '0' is it port-id of
current
implementation. With OvS/OvS-DPDK it is point-to-point only, I don't see a
way to do point-2-multipoint even when using ovs-vtep/vtep-ctl. Wanted to
know if it's possible and any reference available?
Thanks.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 5:27 PM Ravi Kerur wrote:
> Hello OvS team,
>
> I a
Hi,
I am using OVS 2.13.90 and getting errors when I run
ovs-vtep
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/share/openvswitch/scripts/ovs-vtep", line 26, in
import ovs.daemon
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ovs'
pip install ovs
Requirement already satisfied: ovs in
Hello,
I am working on OvS-DPDK and conntrack and seeing weird behavior, maybe I
am doing something wrong.
ovs-vswitchd --version
ovs-vswitchd (Open vSwitch) 2.13.3
DPDK 19.11.5
I have setup using
https://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/tutorials/ovs-conntrack/
After initial syn/syn-ack/ack,
Hello,
I am looking into running OvS-DPDK as a secondary DPDK process instead of
primary. We have a custom built binary running as a primary DPDK process
and would like to augment it with OvS-DPDK running as secondary. DPDK EAL
has '--proc-type=secondary' parameter which could be used to run as
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:00 AM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 03:06:28AM -0800, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > I am looking into running OvS-DPDK as a secondary DPDK process instead of
> > primary. We have a custom built binary running as a primary DPDK process
>
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:56 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 3/11/21 8:46 PM, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:00 AM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 03:06:28AM -0800, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> >>> I am looking into running OvS-DPDK
47 matches
Mail list logo
