Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC Patch v1] netdev-dpdk: Reintroduce shared mempools.

2018-02-13 Thread Stokes, Ian
ximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>; antonio.fische...@gmail.com > Subject: RE: [ovs-dev] [RFC Patch v1] netdev-dpdk: Reintroduce shared > mempools. > > Hi, > > I've also reviewed the code and done tests to exercise the mempool code. > The behavior seems to be same as with previ

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC Patch v1] netdev-dpdk: Reintroduce shared mempools.

2018-02-13 Thread Stokes, Ian
> -Original Message- > From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:35 AM > To: Stokes, Ian ; d...@openvswitch.org > Cc: antonio.fische...@gmail.com; Ilya Maximets ; > Jan Scheurich

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC Patch v1] netdev-dpdk: Reintroduce shared mempools.

2018-02-13 Thread Venkatesan Pradeep
> boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Traynor > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 4:05 PM > To: Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; d...@openvswitch.org > Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>; antonio.fische...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC Patch v1] netdev-dp

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC Patch v1] netdev-dpdk: Reintroduce shared mempools.

2018-02-13 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 02/13/2018 09:07 AM, Stokes, Ian wrote: > Hi all, > > Just pinging for feedback for this patch. If we are to include this for > branch 2.9 as a bug fix I think we need feedback quite soon. > > Have people had time to validate and review? > Hi Ian, As per the other thread I have reviewed

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC Patch v1] netdev-dpdk: Reintroduce shared mempools.

2018-02-13 Thread Stokes, Ian
Hi all, Just pinging for feedback for this patch. If we are to include this for branch 2.9 as a bug fix I think we need feedback quite soon. Have people had time to validate and review? Thanks Ian > -Original Message- > From: Stokes, Ian > Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 11:39 AM >

[ovs-dev] [RFC Patch v1] netdev-dpdk: Reintroduce shared mempools.

2018-02-08 Thread Ian Stokes
This commit manually reverts the current per port mempool model to the previous shared mempool model for DPDK ports. OVS previously used a shared mempool model for ports with the same MTU configuration. This was replaced by a per port mempool model to address issues flagged by users such as: