Hi Ilya,
Thanks for having look, much appreciated!
On 17/05/2018 14:26, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Hello.
> Thanks for working on this. But it seems that this patch
> completely breaks build without dpdk. There are a lot of places
> where dpdk functions in use regardless of define DPDK_NETDEV.
Hello.
Thanks for working on this. But it seems that this patch
completely breaks build without dpdk. There are a lot of places
where dpdk functions in use regardless of define DPDK_NETDEV.
Beside that I see that you're allocating new mbufs inside generic
dp_packet_* functions. But, in context of
Overview
This patchset introduces support for multi-segment mbufs to OvS-DPDK.
Multi-segment mbufs are typically used when the size of an mbuf is
insufficient to contain the entirety of a packet's data. Instead, the
data is split across numerous mbufs, each carrying a portion, or
