, 2018 10:38 AM
To: Flavio Leitner
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] REDHAT: Route issue with dpdk-bond ports
> It looks good to me. I hope it does work for any number of ports
> and doesn't show any errors. If that's the case, please submit a
> formal pa
> It looks good to me. I hope it does work for any number of ports
> and doesn't show any errors. If that's the case, please submit a
> formal patch to ovs-dev@ and don't forget to request to patch 2.9
> (if you need that) as it's branched off at this point.
Ok Flavio. I will send formal patch to
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 08:32:03AM +, Vishal Deep Ajmera wrote:
> > OK, what about this patch instead? It should fix the issue without the
> > errors. I have not tested.
>
> I tried your patch but it does not re-add the routes. The reason is doing
> $ ifup br0 will not invoke ifup-post since
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:12:40AM +, Vishal Deep Ajmera wrote:
> > BTW, I suggested earlier but maybe I wasn't clear.
> >
> > Instead of adding networking configuration to the bridge's port, just
> > leave it alone with a name that doesn't bother you.
> >
> > Then create an internal port wit
> BTW, I suggested earlier but maybe I wasn't clear.
>
> Instead of adding networking configuration to the bridge's port, just
> leave it alone with a name that doesn't bother you.
>
> Then create an internal port with the name and the networking
> configuration you need. It won't change its MAC
> OK, what about this patch instead? It should fix the issue without the
> errors. I have not tested.
I tried your patch but it does not re-add the routes. The reason is doing
$ ifup br0 will not invoke ifup-post since the bridge port is already UP and so
$OVSBRIDGECONFIGURED will be 'true'.
I
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:17:07PM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 04:35:01PM +, Vishal Deep Ajmera wrote:
> > > What happens if you have two or more bonds or if we fix dpdk port too,
> > > what happens when you have more than one?
> > > I think you will see errors/fai
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 04:35:01PM +, Vishal Deep Ajmera wrote:
> > What happens if you have two or more bonds or if we fix dpdk port too,
> > what happens when you have more than one?
> > I think you will see errors/failures.
>
> I tried with two dpdk ports and I do see following print on
> What happens if you have two or more bonds or if we fix dpdk port too,
> what happens when you have more than one?
> I think you will see errors/failures.
I tried with two dpdk ports and I do see following print on console though
it seem harmless and does not impact route table. Also, this h
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:25:36AM +, Vishal Deep Ajmera wrote:
> Hi Flavio,
>
> I tried to look closer into ifup-ovs script particularly for OVSDPDKPort &
> OVSDPDKBOND cases.
> With the change given below (git diff) at the end OVSDPDKBOND case, I see
> that the routes
> are getting insta
Hi Flavio,
I tried to look closer into ifup-ovs script particularly for OVSDPDKPort &
OVSDPDKBOND cases.
With the change given below (git diff) at the end OVSDPDKBOND case, I see that
the routes
are getting installed again after adding dpdkbond port to the bridge. Perhaps
the same fix
needs
Message-
> From: Flavio Leitner [mailto:f...@sysclose.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 9:17 AM
> To: Vishal Deep Ajmera
> Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] REDHAT: Route issue with dpdk-bond ports
>
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 08:31:49AM +
issue.
Warm Regards,
Vishal Ajmera
-Original Message-
From: Flavio Leitner [mailto:f...@sysclose.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 9:17 AM
To: Vishal Deep Ajmera
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] REDHAT: Route issue with dpdk-bond ports
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 08:31:49AM +, Vishal Deep Ajmera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Red-Hat, kernel IP Routes are getting deleted whenever a dpdk-bond port is
> added to "netdev" type bridge. I understand that when a DPDK port is added to
> ovs, the bridge port (LOCAL) is reconfigured with MAC addre
-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Vishal Deep Ajmera
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 3:43 PM
To: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] REDHAT: Route issue with dpdk-bond ports
Can someone help with route issue below ?
Warm Regards,
Vishal
From:
ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitc
issue with dpdk-bond ports
Hi,
On Red-Hat, kernel IP Routes are getting deleted whenever a dpdk-bond port is
added to "netdev" type bridge. I understand that when a DPDK port is added to
ovs, the bridge port (LOCAL) is reconfigured with MAC address which requires
IOCTL calls to bring the d
Hi,
On Red-Hat, kernel IP Routes are getting deleted whenever a dpdk-bond port is
added to "netdev" type bridge. I understand that when a DPDK port is added to
ovs, the bridge port (LOCAL) is reconfigured with MAC address which requires
IOCTL calls to bring the device down and up. This causes ker
17 matches
Mail list logo
