: Re: [ovs-discuss] TSO changes with OVS-DPDK for higher throughput
Hi Ian,
In May this year, through mailing list you had sent me pointers to patches to
enable Multi-Segment mbuf & TSO. Yes, the patches apply to the adb3f0b
("python: Avoid flake8 warning for unused variables.") comm
ove do these apply for you?
>
> Regards
> Ian
> >
> > Along with which version of DPDK need to use for compilation?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Murali
> >
> > ----------------------------
> > *From:* Ian Stokes
> > *Sent:* Monday, Ju
version of DPDK need to use for compilation?
Regards
Murali
From: Ian Stokes
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 10:56:34 PM
To: Murali Veluru; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] TSO changes with OVS-DPDK for higher throughput
On 6/24/2019 1:03 PM
ds
Murali
*From:* Ian Stokes
*Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2019 10:56:34 PM
*To:* Murali Veluru; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
*Subject:* Re: [ovs-discuss] TSO changes with OVS-DPDK for higher
throughput
On 6/24/2019 1:03 PM, Murali Veluru wrote:
Hi All,
I am t
On 6/24/2019 1:03 PM, Murali Veluru wrote:
Hi All,
I am testing ovs-dpdk performance test with the help of IPERF.
I created VM using qemu command.
I assigned IP 10.0.1.16 to VM and other device IP is 10.0.1.18 (Dev2). I
am able to ping and able to run IPERF.
It is giving average output
Hi All,
I am testing ovs-dpdk performance test with the help of IPERF.
I created VM using qemu command.
I assigned IP 10.0.1.16 to VM and other device IP is 10.0.1.18 (Dev2). I am
able to ping and able to run IPERF.
It is giving average output ~3.5G form VM to DEV2 on 10G physical interface.
