Re: [ovs-discuss] Drop in performance for conntrack cases with OVS

added back the alias Darrell On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 8:00 PM Darrell Ball wrote: > Thanks for the report Anju > > Extensive testing was done without tunnels (both PVP and P2P; flows > 2-100k). > Threads and queues were also varied. The testing is about a year ol

Re: [ovs-discuss] Re：Re： [HELP] Question about icmp pkt marked Invalid by userspace conntrack

Hi Timo On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 1:00 AM txfh2007 wrote: > Hi Darrell: > I have set burst size 2 times of rate（e.g. if rate is 1Gbps, then > burst is 2Gbps）. and have tried different rate value. the result is as > below: > meter rate/iperf test result: 1G / 800M > meter rate/iperf test

Re: [ovs-discuss] Re：Re： [HELP] Question about icmp pkt marked Invalid by userspace conntrack

Hi Timo On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 11:58 PM txfh2007 wrote: > Hi Darrell: > > I have tried to manual set flow table and meter action, to arrange > meter action at the end of the flow pipeline(just before the output > action), and delete conntrack related actions. But the iperf result is also

Re: [ovs-discuss] Re：Re： [HELP] Question about icmp pkt marked Invalid by userspace conntrack

> > > https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/acc5df0e3cb036524d49891fdb9ba89b609dd26a > > > > > For my case, the meter action is on openflow table 46, and the ct action > is on table 44, the output action is on table 65, so I guess the order is > right? > > > Could

Re: [ovs-discuss] Re：Re： [HELP] Question about icmp pkt marked Invalid by userspace conntrack

5] 99.00-100.00 sec 98.3 MBytes 824 Mbits/sec > [ 5] 100.00-100.04 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 5] 0.00-100.04 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender > [ 5] 0.00-100.04 sec 9.29 GBytes

Re: [ovs-discuss] Re：Re： [HELP] Question about icmp pkt marked Invalid by userspace conntrack

on is on table 65, so I guess the order is > right? > Could you dump the 'relevant' datapath flows before adding the meter rule and after adding the meter rule ? ovs-appctl dpif/dump-flows > > Thanks > > Timo > > > > ---------

Re: [ovs-discuss] Re：Re： [HELP] Question about icmp pkt marked Invalid by userspace conntrack

ty and performance. > JTBC, in terms of your measurements, how did you arrive at the 5Gbps - > instrumented code or otherwise ?. > (I can verify that later when I have a setup). > > > Darrell > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:23 AM Darrell

Re: [ovs-discuss] Re：Re： [HELP] Question about icmp pkt marked Invalid by userspace conntrack

t 31, 2019 at 9:23 AM Darrell Ball wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 3:04 AM txfh2007 via discuss < > ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org> wrote: > >> Hi Ben && Darrell： >> This patch works, but after merging this patch I have found the >> ipe

Re: [ovs-discuss] Re：Re： [HELP] Question about icmp pkt marked Invalid by userspace conntrack

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 3:04 AM txfh2007 via discuss < ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org> wrote: > Hi Ben && Darrell： > This patch works, but after merging this patch I have found the iperf > throughout decrease from 5Gbps+ to 500Mbps. what is the 5Gbps number ? Is that the number with marking

Re: [ovs-discuss] Re：Re： [HELP] Question about icmp pkt marked Invalid by userspace conntrack

This is fixed via 9171c63532ee9cbc63bb8cfae364ab071f44389b 2.10.4/3/2 will have it On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:56 PM txfh2007 via discuss < ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org> wrote: > Hi Ben: > This is my tcpdump result and the userspace datapath cache flow: > >Note: the icmp reply got by ovs

[ovs-discuss] Fwd: FW: [HELP] Question about icmp pkt marked Invalid by userspace conntrack

1/ Pls provide a hexdump capture of the request and corresponding reply packets. 2/ Also, I would check 2.10.4 or latest 2.10. On 10/10/19, 7:51 AM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of txfh2007 via discuss" wrote: Hi all: I was using OVS-DPDK(version 2.10-1), and I

Re: [ovs-discuss] FW: OVS 2.9.0 native firewall drops empty payload TCP packets continued

> difference. > > > > The issues we see is on OVS computes. > > > > Jing > > > > *From:* Darrell Ball > *Sent:* Friday, May 03, 2019 3:34 PM > *To:* Zhang, Jing C. (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) > *Cc:* Han Zhou ; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org > *Subject:* Re: FW: [o

Re: [ovs-discuss] FW: OVS 2.9.0 native firewall drops empty payload TCP packets continued

ce datapath then that patch would be applicable. Did you apply the patch to ALL userspace dataspath instances that could be in you packet path ? What is the path followed in the problem case ? > >1. > > > > The nature of the issue is same, OVS native firewall drops packets less

Re: [ovs-discuss] FW: OVS 2.9.0 native firewall drops empty payload TCP packets continued

couple corrections inline On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 8:52 AM Darrell Ball wrote: > > > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 8:29 AM Zhang, Jing C. (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) < > jing.c.zh...@nokia.com> wrote: > >> >>1. This issue is with native OVS firewall where the data flows are

Re: [ovs-discuss] FW: OVS 2.9.0 native firewall drops empty payload TCP packets continued

ath_version: "" > 4/ You are using userspace datapath on this particular node without dpdk support Is that intentional ? > > > *From:* Darrell Ball > *Sent:* Friday, May 3, 2019 11:24 AM > *To:* Zhang, Jing C. (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) > *Cc:* Han Zhou ; ovs-di

Re: [ovs-discuss] FW: OVS 2.9.0 native firewall drops empty payload TCP packets continued

and jtbc, ovs-dpdk uses the userspace datapath On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 8:24 AM Darrell Ball wrote: > The node you are displaying below is running kernel datapath > > fyi: The fix Han pointed you to is for userspace datapath/conntrack > > > > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 8:14 AM

Re: [ovs-discuss] FW: OVS 2.9.0 native firewall drops empty payload TCP packets continued

t; > Below is from OVS compute: > > > > # ovs-vsctl --no-wait get Open_vSwitch . other_config > > {} > > # ovs-vsctl -- list bridge br-int | grep datapath > > datapath_id : "aaf62aaf3546" > > datapath_type : system > > datap

Re: [ovs-discuss] FW: OVS 2.9.0 native firewall drops empty payload TCP packets continued

What do the following commands yield ? sudo ovs-vsctl -- get bridge datapath_type sudo ovs-vsctl --no-wait get Open_vSwitch . other_config > > *From: * on behalf of Han Zhou < > zhou...@gmail.com> > *Date: *Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 7:12 PM > *To: *"Zhang, Jing C. (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" > *Cc:

Re: [ovs-discuss] Changing Destination IP and MAC Address for TCP Connection

From: on behalf of karthik karra Date: Thursday, December 6, 2018 at 5:35 PM To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-discuss] Changing Destination IP and MAC Address for TCP Connection Hi All, I have three VMs VM1 - 192.168.1.101 VM2 - 192.168.1.102 VM3 - 192.168.1.103 I am using

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS 2.9.0 native firewall drops empty payload TCP packets

This seems to be in the kernel datapath and maybe recent issue Greg, do you want to take a look ? On 8/27/18, 9:50 AM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Darrell Ball" wrote: I can take a look. On 8/27/18, 9:47 AM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitc

Re: [ovs-discuss] Recall: OVS 2.9.0 native firewall drops empty payload TCP packets

Did you mean to recall the issue ? On 8/27/18, 9:48 AM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Zhang, Jing C. (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" wrote: Zhang, Jing C. (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) would like to recall the message, "[ovs-discuss] OVS 2.9.0 native firewall drops empty payload TCP

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS 2.9.0 native firewall drops empty payload TCP packets

I can take a look. On 8/27/18, 9:47 AM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Ben Pfaff" wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 01:20:15PM +, Zhang, Jing C. (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) wrote: > We have customers reporting sluggish HTTP download with OVS 2.9.0. After debugging, we

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] Delete Flows matching specific cookie - OpenFlow 1.3.5 Spec support by OpenVSwitch

prints to the console all OpenFlow messages received. Usually, switch should specify the name of a bridge in the ovs−vswitchd database. “ eg) ovs-ofctl monitor br0 65534 invalid_ttl --detach --no-chdir --pidfile 2> ofctl_monitor.log On 24 April 2018 at 02:42, Darrell

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] Delete Flows matching specific cookie - OpenFlow 1.3.5 Spec support by OpenVSwitch

//You can verify that OVS supports deletion by cookie specification by checking these tests: 932: ofproto.at:1746ofproto - del flows based on cookie 933: ofproto.at:1767ofproto - del flows based on cookie mask // Run the tests using “make check” like this: sudo make check

Re: [ovs-discuss] tcp stream is broken with userspace conntrack after VM migration

Thanks for the report Neo. From: on behalf of "Yangxiaoliang (Neo)" Date: Saturday, February 24, 2018 at 2:09 AM To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-discuss] tcp stream is broken with

Re: [ovs-discuss] 答复: conn_key_hash change hash arithmetic

I commented on this many weeks/months ago. Thanks Darrell On 2/1/18, 2:54 PM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Ben Pfaff" wrote: Darrell, any comment on this? + and ^ are both valid choices of operator

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] Userspace space conntrack tcp issue

Hi Wang Pls see inline Thanks Darrell On 1/1/18, 10:57 PM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of 王志克" wrote: Hi, I am testing below scenario, and I think there is some issue on TCP conntrack

Re: [ovs-discuss] conn_key_hash change hash arithmetic

for your reply. And my reply as below. 发件人: Darrell Ball [mailto:db...@vmware.com] 发送时间: 2017年12月15日 1:56 收件人: liucheng (J); ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org 主题: Re: [ovs-discuss] conn_key_hash change hash arithmetic From: <ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org<mailto:ovs-discuss-boun...@

Re: [ovs-discuss] conn_key_hash change hash arithmetic

From: on behalf of "liucheng (J)" Date: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 9:04 AM To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-discuss] conn_key_hash change hash arithmetic Hello all, I run a test with

Re: [ovs-discuss] Will fragment be processed in userspace(dpdk) connection track

Yes I have done some work here and it will likely be added for 2.9 From: on behalf of 王嵘 Date: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 4:10 AM To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-discuss] Will fragment

Re: [ovs-discuss] Problem on creating bridge interface on OVS_DPDK in a VMware VM guest

On 9/28/17, 10:30 AM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Darrell Ball" <ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of db...@vmware.com> wrote: On 9/27/17, 8:01 PM, "BALL SUN" <paul...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [ovs-discuss] Problem on creating bridge interface on OVS_DPDK in a VMware VM guest

hy. AFAIK, vmxnet3-usermap is deprecated in favor of vmxnet3, but others might know more about this? On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> wrote: > > > On 9/26/17, 11:47 PM, "BALL SUN" <paul...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [ovs-discuss] Problem on creating bridge interface on OVS_DPDK in a VMware VM guest

On 9/26/17, 9:19 PM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Darrell Ball" <ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of db...@vmware.com> wrote: On 9/26/17, 8:26 PM, "BALL SUN" <paul...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [ovs-discuss] Problem on creating bridge interface on OVS_DPDK in a VMware VM guest

> the linux version is CentOS7 (3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64), and we currently > try to run the OVS+DPDK as a VMware guest. the expected topology would > be connect another two nodes with this OVS+DPDK vm. > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>

Re: [ovs-discuss] IPv4 address support for port configuration in OVS 2.8.0 version

Take a look at netdev_tnl_ip_build_header(…), for example. From: on behalf of Ranjith Kumar D Date: Monday, September 25, 2017 at 11:37 PM To: "disc...@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-discuss] IPv4 address

Re: [ovs-discuss] Problem on creating bridge interface on OVS_DPDK in a VMware VM guest

ould provide all the steps you are using and your environment. On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> wrote: > Do you have a hard requirement to use vmxnet3 ? > What are you requirements otherwise ? > > > On 9/25/17, 9:06 PM,

Re: [ovs-discuss] Problem on creating bridge interface on OVS_DPDK in a VMware VM guest

On 9/25/17, 8:31 PM, "Sun Paul" <paul...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi thank for the reply. but can you explain what I should do? Do you have a hard requirement to use ESXi and vmxnet3 ? What are you requirements otherwise ? On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 3:18 AM,

Re: [ovs-discuss] Problem on creating bridge interface on OVS_DPDK in a VMware VM guest

On 9/25/17, 2:53 AM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Sun Paul" wrote: Hi I am trying to have a OVS+DPDK setup on a VM guest in Vmware environment. the network adapter type for the dpdk is

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] adding dpdk ports sharing same pci address to ovs-dpdk bridge

.@openvswitch.org" > >> <disc...@openvswitch.org> > >> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] adding dpdk ports sharing same pci address to ovs- > >> dpdk bridge > >> > >> Hi Kevin, > >> >

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] adding dpdk ports sharing same pci address to ovs-dpdk bridge

Hi Devendra Could you please respond to Kevin’s query just to be sure ? Were you able to confirm those addresses by running ./dpdk-devbind.py -s in your /tools dir? Thanks Darrell On 9/7/17, 11:54 AM, "Kevin Traynor" <ktray...@redhat.com> wrote: On 09/07/2017 0

Re: [ovs-discuss] conntrack: Another ct-clean thread crash bug

gt; -Original Message- > From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-discuss- > boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Darrell Ball > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 11:50 PM > To: Huanglili (lee) <huanglili.hu...@huawei.com&g

Re: [ovs-discuss] conntrack: Another ct-clean thread crash bug

Hmm, that seems odd. Also, the code change you propose below does not make sense and would likely cause similar crashes itself. Maybe, you explain what you are trying to do in your testing ? Can you say what traffic are you sending and from which ports ? I’ll take another look at the related

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK NUMA pmd assignment question for physical port

Adding Billy and Kevin On 9/6/17, 12:22 AM, "Darrell Ball" <db...@vmware.com> wrote: On 9/6/17, 12:03 AM, "王志克" <wangzh...@jd.com> wrote: Hi Darrell, pmd-rxq-affinity has below limitation: (so isolated pmd can not be u

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK NUMA pmd assignment question for physical port

On 9/6/17, 12:03 AM, "王志克" wrote: Hi Darrell, pmd-rxq-affinity has below limitation: (so isolated pmd can not be used for others, which is not my expectation. Lots of VMs come and go on the fly, and manully assignment is not feasible.) >>After

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK NUMA pmd assignment question for physical port

e have more pmds contributes the polling of physical NIC, so performance improvement is expected from total rx traffic view. Br, Wang Zhike -Original Message- From: Darrell Ball [mailto:db...@vmware.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 0

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK NUMA pmd assignment question for physical port

This same numa node limitation was already removed, although same numa is preferred for performance reasons. commit c37813fdb030b4270d05ad61943754f67021a50d Author: Billy O'Mahony Date: Tue Aug 1 14:38:43 2017 -0700 dpif-netdev: Assign ports to pmds on non-local

Re: [ovs-discuss] Reg: Ovs-Dpdk Forwarding Plane.

From: on behalf of Durai Velan Chockalingam Date: Sunday, August 20, 2017 at 12:12 PM To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-discuss] Reg: Ovs-Dpdk Forwarding Plane. Hello All, Am trying to

Re: [ovs-discuss] [openvswitch 2.8.0 dpdk] testsuite: 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1224 1225 1226 2338 failed

-Original Message- From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 4:07 PM To: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> Cc: Joe Stringer <j...@ovn.org>, "b...@openvswitch.org" <b...@openvswitch.org> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] [openvswitch 2.8

Re: [ovs-discuss] [openvswitch 2.8.0 dpdk] testsuite: 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1224 1225 1226 2338 failed

-Original Message- From: Joe Stringer <j...@ovn.org> Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 3:43 PM To: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> Cc: James Page <james.p...@ubuntu.com>, "b...@openvswitch.org" <b...@openvswitch.org> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] [openv

Re: [ovs-discuss] [openvswitch 2.8.0 dpdk] testsuite: 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1224 1225 1226 2338 failed

From: on behalf of James Page Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 2:49 AM To: "b...@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-discuss] [openvswitch 2.8.0 dpdk] testsuite: 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require

From: Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 8:10 PM To: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> Cc: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" <ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require

From: Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 6:59 PM To: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> Cc: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" <ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 a

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require

From: Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 3:18 AM To: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> Cc: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" <ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require Blow is the diagram (usin

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require

From: Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 9:43 PM To: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> Cc: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" <ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require Thanks Darrell, comment i

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS with DPDK QoS (Priority Queue)

-Original Message- From: on behalf of Aleksey Khalikov Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 1:06 AM To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS with DPDK QoS (Priority Queue)

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require

From: on behalf of Hui Xiang Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 7:47 PM To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require Hi guys, Seems OVS-DPDK still missing

Re: [ovs-discuss] max mega flow 64k per pmd or per dpcls?

From: Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 6:57 PM To: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> Cc: "Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash" <bhanuprakash.bodire...@intel.com>, "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" <ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org> Subject:

Re: [ovs-discuss] max mega flow 64k per pmd or per dpcls?

Q: “how it is calculated in such an exact number? “ A: It is a reasonable number to accommodate many cases. Q: “If there are more ports added for polling, for avoid competing can I increase the 64k size into a bigger one?” A: If a larger number is needed, it may imply that adding another PMD

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] rpmbuild failure for ovs_dpdk

Correction: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org On 6/20/17, 9:01 AM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Darrell Ball" <ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of db...@vmware.com> wrote: Again, send to disc...@openvswitch.org Do you se

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - Very poor performance when connected to namespace/container

This should be quite a bit better than the AF_PACKET PMD. This becomes available in 17.08 and is important, it would be nice to get into the next OVS release. Also, any existing data on the performance advantage of AF_PACKET PMD with single queue ? Darrell On 6/16/17, 1:56 AM,

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] How to efficiently connect docker network to ovs+dpdk switch

Pls use the ovs-discuss mailing list On 6/15/17, 5:46 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of 王志克" wrote: Hi All, Previously I use kernel ovs, and docker veth-pair port can be added to ovs bridge directly.

Re: [ovs-discuss] vhost-user multiqueue PMD RSS

:33 PM To: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] vhost-user multiqueue PMD RSS Hi Darrell Ball, Thanks for your reply with the link. Actually, my question comes from there when I was reading the article. In the article, Everything makes perfect sense when it says eac

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK polling cycles and processing cycles for pmd

From: <ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org> on behalf of Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> Date: Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 10:55 AM To: Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com>, "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" <ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK polling cycles and processing cycles for pmd

From: on behalf of Hui Xiang Date: Saturday, June 10, 2017 at 9:06 PM To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK polling cycles and processing cycles for pmd Hi guys, I got below

Re: [ovs-discuss] vhost-user multiqueue PMD RSS

https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/configure-vhost-user-multiqueue-for-ovs-with-dpdk From: on behalf of Hui Jing Date: Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 5:04 AM To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" Subject:

Re: [ovs-discuss] UFID - is flow ufid persistent ?

ufid is derived from a hash of the flow key, so the value of ufid is “consistent” On 5/17/17, 1:33 AM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Avi Cohen (A)" wrote: TWIMC - Solved - the answer is yes.

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS 2.7.0 + DPDK 17.02 + multicore

From: Levente Csikor <csi...@tmit.bme.hu> Date: Sunday, May 7, 2017 at 6:31 AM To: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>, "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitch.org> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS 2.7.0 + DPDK 17.02 + multicore Thanks, it's working now! The 'inter

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS 2.7.0 + DPDK 17.02 + multicore

From: on behalf of Levente Csikor Date: Saturday, May 6, 2017 at 3:36 AM To: "disc...@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS 2.7.0 + DPDK 17.02 + multicore Dear All, I would like to run OVS with DPDK

Re: [ovs-discuss] DPDK OVS HW offload related question

On 5/3/17, 12:52 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote: On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:56:43AM +, Patil, Harish wrote: > > > > > > > > > >On 4/26/17, 11:45 AM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of > >Patil, Harish"

Re: [ovs-discuss] DPDK OVS HW offload related question

On 4/26/17, 11:45 AM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Patil, Harish" wrote: >Hello, > >We are planning to utilize the rte_flow (generic flow interface)

Re: [ovs-discuss] dpdkvhostuser interface

On 4/26/17, 12:06 AM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Avi Cohen (A)" wrote: Hello, dpdkvhostuserclient interface type is used to connect a VM to the ovs-dpdk Is it possible to connect a

Re: [ovs-discuss] support for ct argument alg=ftp when running openvswitch with dpdk in userspace

I am working on it. Thanks Darrell On 4/3/17, 8:40 AM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Patrick Bergamin" wrote: Hi, It doesn't appear that openvswitch using dpdk and running in

Re: [ovs-discuss] SR-IOV with Open vSwitch

:18 PM To: Purnendu <purne...@gmail.com> Cc: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>, discuss <disc...@openvswitch.org> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] SR-IOV with Open vSwitch Hi Purnendu, Thank you for the response. I d like to apologize for the mistake that I made in the diagram. I mixed up the

Re: [ovs-discuss] SR-IOV with Open vSwitch

From: Advith Nagappa <advith.naga...@gmail.com> Date: Friday, March 31, 2017 at 1:14 PM To: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> Cc: discuss <disc...@openvswitch.org> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] SR-IOV with Open vSwitch Darrell, Thank you for the resources and the response. I am

Re: [ovs-discuss] Error attaching device to DPDK

l to both nodes. The lstopo command can also be used for this. Hope some of that helps, Billy. From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Darrell Ball Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [ovs-discuss] Error attaching device to DPDK

evice :83:00.1 >>[1.689018] DMAR: Hardware identity mapping for device :83:00.2 >>[1.689024] DMAR: Hardware identity mapping for device :83:00.3 >>[1.689025] DMAR: Setting RMRR: >>[1.689026] DMAR: Ignoring identity map for HW passthrough device >>

Re: [ovs-discuss] Error attaching device to DPDK

see inline below But a few questions: 1) Are you using the recommended version of dpdk with OVS 2.7 – 16.11 ? 2) Are you getting a crash still or is this post crash ? 3) Was the previous crash still happening with 16.11 or only 17.02 ? Thanks Darrell From:

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK

-discuss/2016-March/040190.html We could document this in OVS DPDK as it is function impacting. From: Advith Nagappa <advith.naga...@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 2:46 PM To: "Stokes, Ian" <ian.sto...@intel.com> Cc: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>, &quo

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS+DPDK: socket permissions' problem

From: on behalf of Aynur Shakirov Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 6:17 AM To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS+DPDK: socket permissions' problem Hello. Meta. OVS ver:

Re: [ovs-discuss] High Priority Traffic Path (dscp) for DPDK-OvS

- Volkan ____ From: Darrell Ball [db...@vmware.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 9:43 AM To: Ali Volkan Atli; disc...@openvswitch.org Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] High Priority Traffic Path (dscp) for DPDK-OvS For completeness There is a

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK

From: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> Date: Monday, March 20, 2017 at 10:12 PM To: Advith Nagappa <advith.naga...@gmail.com>, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitch.org> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK From: &l

Re: [ovs-discuss] High Priority Traffic Path (dscp) for DPDK-OvS

For completeness There is also ingress side policing for DPDK support, but this is yet even further away from your needs On 3/20/17, 11:08 PM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Darrell Ball" <ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of db...@vmware.com> w

Re: [ovs-discuss] High Priority Traffic Path (dscp) for DPDK-OvS

Afaik OVS-DPDK only supports egress-policing qos http://openvswitch.org/support/dist-docs/ovs-vswitchd.conf.db.5.pdf see egress--policer On 3/20/17, 10:30 PM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Ali Volkan Atli"