Am Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2006 23:09 schrieb Alfille, Paul H.,M.D.:
> Correct.
>
> I don't know how large your network is, but there are issues with the
> DS2409.
>
There will be ~80..150 chips for each machine, so triggering the search
algorithm for the entire network is a great cost.
> Basically, w
Correct.
I don't know how large your network is, but there are issues with the DS2409.
Basically, we trigger "branch selection" in the most efficient manner, but owfs
is designed to be multiuser (or at least multiprocessing) which means another
thread may have selected away from the DS2409. This
Am Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2006 22:06 schrieb Paul Alfille:
> A. smart on
> B. I don't know.
>
So reading the $DS2409_ID/main/uncached directory will just trigger the search
on the main subnetwork, instead of the entire network?
Jan
--
1) Never draw what you can copy.
2) Never copy what you ca
A. smart on
B. I don't know.
Paul
On 5/31/06, Jan Kandziora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear all,
I'm planning to attach several onewire keylocks to the network of the machine
I'm developing. My idea was to attach each lock to the main output of a
DS2409 to identify the individual lock and to sho
Dear all,
I'm planning to attach several onewire keylocks to the network of the machine
I'm developing. My idea was to attach each lock to the main output of a
DS2409 to identify the individual lock and to shorten the search algorithm to
the main/ subpath of the network. This seems to work if t
