Am 29.12.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Ursin Soler:
>
> By this year (initial release 7/15) Maxim released the DS28E17 [1]
> which is in my oppinion a game changer.
>
I like to add, the DS28E17 is only available in a very tiny 16TQFN-EP
package, which is very hard to solder by hand (0.5mm pitch, no
I can see no reason for not using moat, aside from differences in failure
state, if any.
C
> On Dec 29, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Jan Kandziora wrote:
>
>> Am 29.12.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Ursin Soler:
>>
>> By this year (initial release 7/15) Maxim released the DS28E17 [1]
>> which is
Am 29.12.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Ursin Soler:
>
> By this year (initial release 7/15) Maxim released the DS28E17 [1]
> which is in my oppinion a game changer. This is (to my knowledge) the
> first time a 1-wire slave has been released that allows to connect
> any micro-proc (like Arduino/AVR) in a
Hello!
By this year (initial release 7/15) Maxim released the DS28E17 [1] which is in
my oppinion a game changer. This is (to my knowledge) the first time a 1-wire
slave has been released that allows to connect any micro-proc (like
Arduino/AVR) in a generic and easy way. Even though the DS2408
On 30.12.2015 06:02, Jan Kandziora wrote:
> is it possible to create a Onewire->I²C bridge with your MOAT? If
> possible as a drop-in replacement of the DS28E17, at least from onewire
> view?
I see no immediate technical problem with either mimicing the 'E17 or
adding a I²C bus channel to the
Am 30.12.2015 um 06:37 schrieb Matthias Urlichs:
> On 30.12.2015 06:02, Jan Kandziora wrote:
>> is it possible to create a Onewire->I²C bridge with your MOAT? If
>> possible as a drop-in replacement of the DS28E17, at least from onewire
>> view?
>
> I see no immediate technical problem with
Am 29.12.2015 um 19:43 schrieb Jan Kandziora:
> Am 29.12.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Ursin Soler:
>>
>> By this year (initial release 7/15) Maxim released the DS28E17 [1]
>> which is in my oppinion a game changer.
>>
> I like to add, the DS28E17 is only available in a very tiny 16TQFN-EP
> package,
On 28.12.2015 23:19, Markus Gaugusch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Ubuntu 15.10 and the included owfs (2.9p8) is quite old. I'd
> like to build a current version, but all information I could find for
> building on Ubuntu is quite outdated (based on 12.04 and cvs).
>
You could start with the
Hi Matthias!
How do I build the .deb packages? I found the "debian" subdir in the
official code, but what's the debian equivalent to the specfile and
"rpmbuild -bb"? :-)
thanks,
Markus
On Dez 29, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:34:37
>From: Matthias
My personal policy is that everything that goes under /usr /bin /sbin etc.
should by installed by the OS package manager, while direct installation (“make
install”) under /opt is fine, provided that a non privileged user account is
used.
So I would suggest to create a system user account (say
The latest version is available packaged for Debian here:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/owfs
There are also Ubuntu Xenial packages available:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/owfs
I would create a PPA on launchpad and copy the Xenial package into it and
specify recompilation for 15.10. It
11 matches
Mail list logo