Can somebody explain to me why on earth people use so many 1wire buses? Do many
use hundreds of devices and need to split them across buses? That thing has 17
1wire channels. I have never had need for more than 1, even with >100 sensors.
The whole beauty of 1Wire is extendable single bus multi
:-)
I bought it mainly because it made interfacing with Raspberry Pi easy
(don't have to solder something up myself), and it contains a
Realtime-watch which is nice to have if NTP is not available.
But also I think a failing device or short circuit would not bring down
the whole network if the
Am 31.12.2015 um 09:30 schrieb Colin Reese:
> Can somebody explain to me why on earth people use so many 1wire
> buses?
>
You may want to have topographical addressing when you only have
iButtons and passive Keylocks. In that case, the only chance to find out
where the iButton was plugged is to
Am 31.12.2015 um 09:17 schrieb Henrik Östman:
>
> I have a question, why does some of my 1-wire devices get listed several
> times by OWFS? They have the same ID and inode-number, so now my
> application have to filter out the duplicates.
> I'm running OWSERVER:
>
> owserver version:
>
Hi,
I've been lurking for a while. This isn't exactly 1-wire related, but I
know a bunch of people on this list are interested in control systems.
When I rebuilt my house, I put in a system that is a combination of
residential and commercial design with much more controllability than
would
Am 31.12.2015 um 21:59 schrieb Jerry Scharf:
>
> I've been lurking for a while. This isn't exactly 1-wire related, but I
> know a bunch of people on this list are interested in control systems.
>
As I'm doing a similar thing professionally (with Onewire, OWFS, Tcl,
Raspi), I first want to point
Hello!
I have a question, why does some of my 1-wire devices get listed several
times by OWFS? They have the same ID and inode-number, so now my
application have to filter out the duplicates.
I'm running OWSERVER:
owserver version:
2.8p15
libow version:
2.8p15
On a Raspberry Pi with
