[mailto:sven.gierm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 24 February 2017 8:21 PM
To: OWFS (One-wire file system) discussion and help
<owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] Fine-tune timing against disappearing slaves
Just to report back my results:
I still have n
Just to report back my results:
I still have no idea, why it was a difference between ARMEL and i386.
But none of my efforts showed any advantage... I ended up with a plain bus,
even dropped the Cat.5 part completely and was unable to communicate with
my client nodes.
And then I realized, that I
Jan, thanks for the detailed explanation!
My main problem was/is, that even when I disconnect 2 branches and only
have branch "B" or "C", it won't make a difference. But there's another
change, I did not remember:
Colin, I use OneWireHub: https://github.com/orgua/OneWireHub
The difference is,
Sven, what code are you using on your attiny?
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 7:27 AM, Jan Kandziora wrote:
>
>> Am 15.02.2017 um 08:25 schrieb Sven Giermann:
>>
>> I have several temperature sensors and 1 DS2423 counter in one room. All
>> are connected with a Cat.5 network cable (about 30
Am 15.02.2017 um 08:25 schrieb Sven Giermann:
>
> I have several temperature sensors and 1 DS2423 counter in one room. All
> are connected with a Cat.5 network cable (about 30 meters) in a single bus
> that ends in another room with a small embedded Debian ARM (armel) server
> that runs OWFS
Hi all,
I guess I need some help getting my devices up on my 1-wire bus.
The topology is not really perfect, but a similiar setup used to work in
the past and I even tried to create a single branch, which didn't help.
So - what's my setup?
I have several temperature sensors and 1 DS2423 counter