On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 15:10, A C wrote:
> Or you can always just add it into the official linksys firmware.
> Here is my notes on it. Sort of cryptic because I was just using it
> as a reference for myself:
>
> # extract kernel
> dd if=WRT54GV2_3.01.3_US_code.bin of=kern.gz count=669953 bs=1 ski
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 15:03, A C wrote:
> v3 is identical v2.2 with exception of led location I believe. You
> can use "TheRodents" build for that, which is what I run on one of my
> v2.2s with Christian's OWFS binaries.
It certainly seems very similar to the v2.2.
What is "TheRodents" build?
>
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 20:41, Christian Magnusson wrote:
> You can find some of the Makefiles and patches at this URL:
> http://home.mag.cx/uclinux/owfs/patches/linksys/ewrt/
>
Thanks very much for that link, at first sight it seems to have the bits
I need.
> I guess you have to compile both fuse
You can find some of the Makefiles and patches at this URL:
http://home.mag.cx/uclinux/owfs/patches/linksys/ewrt/
I guess you have to compile both fuse and owfs since you have
another kernel... and remember that pthread has to be installed
in /lib too. Look at some of the patches I made in ewrt-0
I have only tried to compile fuse for 2.4.20 to WRT54G, and that's
why I can't use the latest fuse-cvs version too... It use some new
struct members in "struct super_operations" which was added in 2.4.21.
If you want to compile fuse for 2.4.29 should be able to use latest cvs
(+some patches) or f
I'll extract my latest makefiles for fuse and upload them somewhere.
Probably done within an hour or so... Have to look at the hockey at
TV first.. I'll tell you where you can find it later.
/Christian
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 20:52, Paul Hilton wrote:
> Thanks for the info.
>
> Unfortunately the
Or you can always just add it into the official linksys firmware.
Here is my notes on it. Sort of cryptic because I was just using it
as a reference for myself:
# extract kernel
dd if=WRT54GV2_3.01.3_US_code.bin of=kern.gz count=669953 bs=1 skip=60
bs is bs from below subtract 59 for the header
v3 is identical v2.2 with exception of led location I believe. You
can use "TheRodents" build for that, which is what I run on one of my
v2.2s with Christian's OWFS binaries.
I just started using the Experimental build, wasn't there an option to
build with the 2.4.20 kernel? If not, I'll be runn
Thanks for the info.
Unfortunately the non Experimental OpenWRT doesn't claim to support the
v3 hardware that is currently being sold. (Which is what I have)
I'll try to get a version fuse to compile & try it again.
Paul
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 14:23, A C wrote:
> You have to recomplie fuse for y
You have to recomplie fuse for your build of OpenWRT. You're using
the experimental build which uses the 2.4.29 kernel sources. eWRT
uses the stock kernel 2.4.20.
Christian's binaries work fine with the non Experimental version of
OpenWRT because they are the same kernel versions.
On Apr 9, 200
Christian,
A great idea porting this to the WRT54G, it'll make an easy way to make
a small customised one wire controller.
are there any source files for this version for the WRT54G? Or perhaps
patches from the standard source? In particular a suitable Makefile.
I am using a WRT54G v3 hardware,
11 matches
Mail list logo
