Re: [Owfs-developers] python-ow failure with new Raspbian Stretch

2017-12-17 Thread Matthias Urlichs via Owfs-developers
On 17.12.2017 00:19, Stefano Miccoli wrote: > Unfortunately owpython (the swig bindings) is not under active > development. I'd go a step further and remove them from the next release. -- -- Matthias Urlichs -- Check

Re: [Owfs-developers] python-ow failure with new Raspbian Stretch

2017-12-17 Thread Gregg Levine
Hello! I'd go a bigger step further and make them optional by way of how the configure script is managed. I manage three platforms here. My desktop a 32 bit machine running Slackware 11.0 Linux, and this laptop, that also runs Slackware 14.2 in 64 bit mode. And of course any number of Raspberry Pi

Re: [Owfs-developers] python-ow failure with new Raspbian Stretch

2017-12-17 Thread Colin Reese
I do exclusively. I was using my own wrapper reading directories but now use pyownet. C > On Dec 17, 2017, at 8:45 AM, Gregg Levine wrote: > > Hello! > I'd go a bigger step further and make them optional by way of how the > configure script is managed. I manage three

Re: [Owfs-developers] python-ow failure with new Raspbian Stretch

2017-12-17 Thread Jan Kandziora
Am 17.12.2017 um 17:45 schrieb Gregg Levine: > Hello! > I'd go a bigger step further and make them optional by way of how the > configure script is managed. I manage three platforms here. My desktop > a 32 bit machine running Slackware 11.0 Linux, and this laptop, that > also runs Slackware 14.2

Re: [Owfs-developers] python-ow failure with new Raspbian Stretch

2017-12-17 Thread Tomasz Torcz ️
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 04:58:15PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs via Owfs-developers wrote: > On 17.12.2017 00:19, Stefano Miccoli wrote: > > Unfortunately owpython (the swig bindings) is not under active > > development. > > I'd go a step further and remove them from the next release. +1 from me!

Re: [Owfs-developers] python-ow failure with new Raspbian Stretch

2017-12-17 Thread Matthias Urlichs via Owfs-developers
On 17.12.2017 17:45, Gregg Levine wrote: > Of course the merely obvious question is why the swig bindings are not > under active development. Because they're mosty useless, IMHO. In any sort off production environment I want a way to access the actual bus and check which data is actually out

Re: [Owfs-developers] python-ow failure with new Raspbian Stretch

2017-12-17 Thread HW
Stefano and the others who also responded, Thanks very much for your clarification of this problem and especially for the detailed suggestions on how to move forward! -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of