Re: ASP.Net 1.0 in 3.5 container

2012-06-13 Thread Preet Sangha
I've not done this, but I'm wondering if you can just use two virtual directories each with a different WebApplication framework/type? And Hyperlink between them? You can upgrade the old pages as time allows, and as time allows add new functionality the 3.5 application? On 13 June 2012 17:04,

Re: ASP.Net 1.0 in 3.5 container

2012-06-13 Thread Michael Ridland
With that you can also use a distributed session state. On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.com wrote: I've not done this, but I'm wondering if you can just use two virtual directories each with a different WebApplication framework/type? And Hyperlink between

Re: ASP.Net 1.0 in 3.5 container

2012-06-13 Thread Preet Sangha
Sorry Michael I don't know - I've not touched ASP.NET (except for WCF) for years. On 13 June 2012 18:58, Michael Ridland rid...@gmail.com wrote: With that you can also use a distributed session state. On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.comwrote: I've not done

Re: ASP.Net 1.0 in 3.5 container

2012-06-13 Thread djones147
: Re: ASP.Net 1.0 in 3.5 container Sorry Michael I don't know - I've not touched ASP.NET (except for WCF) for years. On 13 June 2012 18:58, Michael Ridland rid...@gmail.com wrote: With that you can also use a distributed session state. On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan

Re: ASP.Net 1.0 in 3.5 container

2012-06-13 Thread Jamie Surman
advise this setup personally). From: Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.com To: ozDotNet ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com Sent: Wednesday, 13 June 2012 6:51 PM Subject: Re: ASP.Net 1.0 in 3.5 container I've not done this, but I'm wondering if you can just use two virtual

ASP.Net 1.0 in 3.5 container

2012-06-12 Thread Grant Molloy
Hi all.. So my boss came to me yesterday and asks me to look into and build a prototype for an ASP.Net 3.5 web app which would need to act as a container for an ancient ASP.Net 1.0 app.. 1.0 app is well and truely past due for life cycling, but org doesn't want to do big bang tech refresh, as