rum.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Tony Wright
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 1:07 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
That does worry me. First, I don't agree with broadening the scope of the list
as it benefits from being
; they remained on the list. Great tie back to home, as you say! That's great
> to hear. [image: 😊]
> --
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on
> behalf of Matthew Lam
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 10:37:30 PM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: Ozdo
: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Tony Wright
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 1:07 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
That does worry me. First, I don't agree with broadening the scope of the list
as it benefits from being niche. Sec
tie back to home, as you say! That's great to hear.
[😊]
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on behalf
of Matthew Lam
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 10:37:30 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
Hi all, Been following since I started my career too. W
gt;
>
> Dang, my oldest email goes back to 02/12/2002. That's impressive. A lot
> has changed over the years!
> You guys are awesome, this list has helped me heaps over those 15ish
> years.
>
> --
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on
&
hat's impressive. A lot
> has changed over the years!
> You guys are awesome, this list has helped me heaps over those 15ish
> years.
>
> --
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on
> behalf of Adrian Halid
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 7:
anged over the years!
You guys are awesome, this list has helped me heaps over those 15ish years.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on behalf
of Adrian Halid
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 7:29:33 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: Ozdotnet list
Will f
Will follow the crowd. +1 for the email list format.
Regards
Adrian Halid
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of noonie
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 7:24 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
Happy to move and follow the
Happy to move and follow the crowd. I really do like the list format
though.
Gmail does a really good job with it and I'm afraid that I might just slide
away if I had to visit yet another website :-p
Lists are old fashioned but, like bow ties, they're still cool after all
these years.
--
noonie
8:52 PM
To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
I still read occasionally, if only to see what Greg K is trying to tame next ;)
Looking through my emails, I joined Stanski's list in 2002 (15 years!?
eeep!) and moved across when the sever was in death-throes and Connors stepped
up. I s
n...@ozdotnet.com>
mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com>> on behalf of David Connors
mailto:da...@connors.com>>
*Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:08:03 AM
*To:* ozDotNet
*Subject:* Re: Ozdotnet list
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 13:06 Tony Wright mailto:tonyw...@gmail.com&
t's not applicable to them anymore and
> they forgot they were on it... whatever the reason).
>
>
> --
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on
> behalf of David Connors
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:08:03 AM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *
.@ozdotnet.com on behalf
of Stuff Box
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:27:33 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
Ive been a lurker here for a long time (around 2003). I enjoy the banter and
conversations. Moving to another platform probably would encourage me to
participate more. Has anyone
them anymore and they
> forgot they were on it... whatever the reason).
>
> From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on behalf
> of David Connors
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:08:03 AM
> To: ozDotNet
> Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
>
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 13:06 Tony
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on behalf
of David Connors
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:08:03 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 13:06 Tony Wright
mailto:tonyw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
That does worry me. First, I don't agree with broadening the scope o
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 13:06 Tony Wright wrote:
> That does worry me. First, I don't agree with broadening the scope of the
> list as it benefits from being niche. Secondly, moving to a new
> environment, while exciting, could spell the end of the list as many
> spectators won't bother making the
>
> All welcome, I say.
>
I'm not racist, but, what about JavaScript developers?
;-) *GK*
gh
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 9:52:52 AM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: Ozdotnet list
>
> If Discourse tags conversations like other typical modern forums, then we
> can have lots of easily identifiable sub-topics like .NET, C#, F#, Xamarin,
> Android, WPF, VB Sucks, OT
otNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
If Discourse tags conversations like other typical modern forums, then we can
have lots of easily identifiable sub-topics like .NET, C#, F#, Xamarin,
Android, WPF, VB Sucks, OT, etc.
There are a hell of a lot of forums for IT, far too many I think, so we'll hav
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on behalf
of Preet Sangha
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 10:28:49 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
As a non Oz developer (I'm in Auckland) I suppose I don't have much say. So
I'll just add that my chief bug bear with of web boards is
ts of hosting, and maybe even go towards promotion to
>> other Aussie devs onboard.
>>
>>
>> This is exciting!
>> --
>> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on
>> behalf of David Richards
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 8
n
> behalf of David Richards
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 8:55:27 AM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: Ozdotnet list
>
> I have no problem with the move. I've been on this list since sometime
> around 2003/4. It's probably a bit ironic that a tech focused list i
ssie devs onboard.
This is exciting!
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on behalf
of David Richards
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 8:55:27 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
I have no problem with the move. I've been on this list since sometime ar
I have no problem with the move. I've been on this list since sometime
around 2003/4. It's probably a bit ironic that a tech focused list is a
bit behind in the tech department.
Suggestions from me:
1. Open it up a bit rather than be focused on .net but make sure its made
clear what category you
I don't contribute here much either, but still read it whenever there's
some interesting discussion.
I welcome the move. However, I think most people would jump straight to
their favourite search engines/StackOverflow when they have an issue. So I
think that's part of why this last has become so i
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 09:56 Stephen Price wrote:
> So far no negative responses. We'll do some trialing to make sure
> Discourse is all it says.
>
I've been needing to rebuild the current server anyway as its Linux Kernel
is too old for Azure + MailMan 3 is out now.
I'll run up the docker image
So far no negative responses. We'll do some trialing to make sure Discourse is
all it says.
We do need to decide as a group of we wish to continue the focus on Aussie
dotnet Devs, or expand it to include other Aussie developers. Is there a
difference these days? Naming is important and refactor
I know I don't contribute much but I do support the move although the
move will likely not increase participation in itself.
If you want to increase participation then we will need to promote the
echoes and if at all possible gain some support from generous
benefactors. Getting a web site pres
le to contain yourself
> and will contribute to the codebase on Sunday mornings, right?
>
>
> cheers
>
> Stephen
> --
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on
> behalf of Greg Keogh
> *Sent:* Monday, 3 April 2017 3:33:36 PM
> *To:* oz
won't be able to contain yourself and
will contribute to the codebase on Sunday mornings, right?
cheers
Stephen
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on behalf
of Greg Keogh
Sent: Monday, 3 April 2017 3:33:36 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
S
Steve, a brave suggestion. This group's traffic has decreased dramatically
in recent years. I presume we're all world-class experts now and don't need
to ask questions that often! A fresh forum with a modern UI and features
sounds quite attractive, as opposed to an old fashioned e-mailing list, but
It's been some years since the big move to Mr Connors gracious hosting of the
eList. Thanks for that by the way David!
For whatever reason it lives on, despite the low traffic. Perhaps it's the
entertainment value of people who live/vent there. Hard to measure. I expect
David would have a way t
32 matches
Mail list logo
