RE: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects

2022-11-10 Thread Nick Randolph
ay, 11 November 2022 4:15 PM To: ozDotNet ; Nick Randolph ; Greg Keogh Cc: Greg Low Subject: RE: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects Offline I've started a conversation with folks that own the LTS policy, I can understand how this is all very murky - I read the policy and even I'm confused.

RE: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects

2022-11-10 Thread David Kean
Kean Subject: RE: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects LTS is a runtime concept, not a SDK concept. SDKs are designed to be backwards compatible so the policy for quite a few years has been to install the new version and remove the old version and projects are supposed to continue to build. I

RE: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects

2022-11-10 Thread David Kean
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2022 1:10 PM To: David Kean ; Greg Keogh Cc: ozDotNet ; Greg Low Subject: RE: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects Lol... you've met workloads, right? Over the last 6 months I've had to switch sdk pinning on and off with almost regular routine due to various issues

Re: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects

2022-11-10 Thread Greg Keogh
> > The SDK itself is fully backwards compatible. Regardless of whether the > runtime itself is LTS, barring workarounds for bugs there should be no need > to pin SDKs. > I have only pinned once ever, and it was for a known problem in 603(?) which caused VS web service publish to fail and I had

RE: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects

2022-11-10 Thread David Kean
11, 2022 8:37 AM To: David Kean Cc: ozDotNet ; Nick Randolph ; Greg Low Subject: Re: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects @Greg Keogh<mailto:gfke...@gmail.com> How did the uninstall of the 6.0 SDK break your project? Are you pinning versions via global.json? I just accepted the update a

Re: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects

2022-11-10 Thread Greg Keogh
> > @Greg Keogh How did the uninstall of the 6.0 SDK > break your project? Are you pinning versions via global.json? > I just accepted the update and let it run to completion smoothly. A short time later I ran a dotnet command and it said that SDK 6 was needed. I saw in Control Panel that only

RE: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects

2022-11-10 Thread David Kean
, 2022 10:46 AM To: ozDotNet Cc: Greg Keogh ; Greg Low ; Nick Randolph Subject: RE: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects Yeh it's not great. I've got no idea who made the decision to uninstall net6 as part of the update to VS17.4. We were caught by this because it also uninstalls Android

Re: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects

2022-11-09 Thread Greg Keogh
Blazor fix Update these two packages to 6.0.11, the last of the v6 series. Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly" Version="6.0.11" /> Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.DevServer" Version=" 6.0.11" You are offered 7.0.0 as the latest, but they will not install

Re: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects

2022-11-09 Thread Greg Keogh
> > One of my dreams is to be able to open a VS project that I haven’t touched > for 6 months, and have it still just work. Far too frequently, I spend an > eternity in dependency hell. > Yes indeed, you mentioned that a few months ago, and it happened to me a few days ago. I opened a project

RE: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects

2022-11-09 Thread Nick Randolph
nd may not reflect the views or opinions of Built to Roam Pty Ltd. From: Dr Greg Low via ozdotnet Sent: Thursday, 10 November 2022 10:42 AM To: ozDotNet Cc: Greg Keogh ; Dr Greg Low Subject: RE: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects One of my dreams is to be able to open a VS project that I h

RE: Visual Studio 17.4.0 side effects

2022-11-09 Thread Dr Greg Low
One of my dreams is to be able to open a VS project that I haven’t touched for 6 months, and have it still just work. Far too frequently, I spend an eternity in dependency hell. Regards, Greg Dr Greg Low 1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile SQL Down Under | Web: