9201410 mobile
>
> SQL Down Under | Web: https://sqldownunder.com | About Greg:
> https://about.me/greg.low
>
>
>
> *From:* David Kean via ozdotnet
> *Sent:* Thursday, 13 October 2022 3:13 PM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Cc:* Greg Keogh ; David Kean >
> *Subjec
out.me/greg.low
From: David Kean via ozdotnet
Sent: Thursday, 13 October 2022 3:13 PM
To: ozDotNet
Cc: Greg Keogh ; David Kean
Subject: RE: Platform x64 argument
Do you actually support/ship your app to run on x86-only or ARM environments?
If not, it probably doesn’t matter and I would probabl
Do you actually support/ship your app to run on x86-only or ARM environments?
If not, it probably doesn’t matter and I would probably give this one and save
the battles for other things.
From: Greg Keogh via ozdotnet
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 9:46 AM
To: ozDotNet
Cc: Greg Keogh
Subject
Sneak some x86 test cases into the build and have it break.
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022, 11:07 Tony McGee via ozdotnet,
wrote:
> My understanding is that you target what you want to support, so if he's
> only shipping fully managed code and supporting x64 systems then it doesn't
> matter too much but in
My understanding is that you target what you want to support, so if he's
only shipping fully managed code and supporting x64 systems then it
doesn't matter too much but in that case may be sidelining x86 or ARM
users for no real reason.
It gets more complicated if you need to support multiple ar
> "it's an x64 world and it creates a better impression"
*the 2000's called and they want their outdated assumptions back*
regards,
Preet, in Auckland NZ
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 at 11:48, Greg Keogh via ozdotnet
wrote:
> Folks, one of my colleagues insists on compiling everything as platform
> x
