On Tue., 3 Jan. 2017, 7:16 pm Greg Keogh, wrote:
> What I liked about netTiers was that the CRUD was basically table-based
> and not over-engineered like many famous ORMs (including EF) and it just
> threw a really handy bridge at the lowest useful level between classes and
>
Sorry for the late reply, only just seen this thread. As Stephen Price said
back in September, I have been using CodeSmith to generate my stored procs
and DAL for well over a decade. Our templates have changed as language
improvements and new product features have come along, but the underlying
I have used Entity Framework myself but generally simply map to stored
procs. Some Linq occasionally creeps in, but the biggest gripe I have with
EF is the lazy loading. It can get nasty very quickly generating ridiculous
amounts of unnecessary traffic as it loads every linked object it comes
>
> >turn off lazy loading and use eager loading instead.
>
Hell yeah!
> Stored procs are best, of course, as it's often much easier to get stored
> proc changes through change control in enterprises than code changes in an
> app, which requires virtually a compete redeploy.
>
Mostly hell
“ORMs are still a real coding productivity boost,”
Are they though? I see them knock at best 10% off a dev project, and that dev
work is at best probably 10% of the lifetime cost of the project.
So a 1% overall saving in project cost ends up determining and limiting so many
aspects of the
Hi Grant et al,
You're psychic, as I was going to post on this old topic later in the week,
as I've rejigged my thinking a little in recent months.
I also used CodeSmith to make CRUD for a few good years and I was impressed
by how easy it was. I used the netTiers templates, not handmade. What I
I often wish there was a better lightweight or that generated chide for you
from stored procs - dapper on steroids. Perhaps I should write one!
On 3 Jan 2017 5:31 PM, "Greg Low (罗格雷格博士)" wrote:
> “ORMs are still a real coding productivity boost,”
>
>
>
> Are they though? I see
On Tue., 3 Jan. 2017, 8:07 pm David Connors, wrote:
> On Tue., 3 Jan. 2017, 7:16 pm Greg Keogh, wrote:
>
> Maybe even David C wouldn't turn his nose up at that?!
>
>
> I probably would. But I have a very different set of drivers to most
> everyobe else in